Please welcome to the stage Robin Hood chairman and CEO Vlad Tenev and chief brokerage officer Steve Quirk.
What’s up everyone? How’s everyone doing? Well, thank you for rising early with us. I know it’s a little bit uh Has the coffee kicked in yet? Yeah, there we go. Good. Who was up all night conversation out there? Isn’t there Q? Uh, how are you doing? I’m doing well. Yeah, I mean it was really fun um you know with the presentation yesterday, but it was very fun talking to everybody afterwards just hearing it’s always fun to hear what what’s resonating and how you’re going to use it. And so a lot of people were talking to me about, you know, what what they’re going to use and what they’re excited about. So that was really fun. What did you what did you hear? What were what was you know, I heard a lot about the hours. Like a lot of people are excited about having the ability to to be able to you know to trade when things are happening. Um because so much is happening when you know when they I don’t know if you guys saw this about five years ago they did this study about um the market’s performance if I just traded in the day and bought and if I bought after the market closed and it was like the market significantly outperformed if I traded in that period and invested in that period. So all the gains and the big moves happen overnight. Yeah. So it was kind of cool. It’s just you know something that’s really interesting. I’ll tell you my least favorite part of HoodSummit so far because I, you know, it’s been generally good, but there’s been one part that’s left me very, very unhappy, which is because we have so many people, it’s over, 1500, our biggest yet. I wasn’t able to get through the entire selfie line. So, I apologize in advance if if you see me shuffling around to places. They’ve told me that uh if I had to take a selfie with everyone and their significant other, it would take me 72 hours, which is amazing. So, it’s a I remember when this was like a little intimate thing and what the first Hood Summit in Miami was a couple hundred people. But, you know what’s really cool? Uh I probably met 50 people who have been at every one of them. Yeah. Yesterday, which is really cool. It’s really fun. Yeah. I mean, one of the things that um uh I had a conversation at the Saturn 5 rocket last night with a few of the customers and uh uh by the way the Saturn 5 rocket. Did you guys see that last night? That was just a unbelievable piece of engineering. It made me very proud to be an American, you know. Um and also realizing that that was built in the 60s. I know it’s crazy. kind of like we we’ve got a lot of work to do to to catch up to to that. But anyway, um uh this customer came up to me and they were like, you know, I hear you talk about ownership, but really um what I love is agency. So, uh the thing that I appreciate most about traders is uh we all believe that um you should be able to do whatever you want with your money. So, nobody should be telling you uh don’t do this with your money. And our job as creators of this platform is to make sure you have the best tools and capabilities possible. So, uh some of my favorites every time we launch a new asset class that you can’t trade anywhere else like the first true per uh that have come in the US uh the first predictions uh for earnings. So now Robin will be the first place where you can trade regulated KPIs for earnings which open up a new class of strategies and then you have 24/7 which again uh you’ll be the first people in the US to trade stocks on Saturdays and that’s that’s another big thing. Not to mention the the Robin Hood agents which will allow you to uh trade while you’re sleeping. So, I think that I’m most excited about seeing what people can do with all these new tools and all the new opportunities that you’re going to uncover. you know the and then the the the one thing that you didn’t mention which actually connects all of them is social because I mean part of what makes this such a great event is not only you listening to us and by the way we are you I mean I’ve been a I’ve been a trader for I don’t want to say how many years but it’s a lot like I was on a trading floor during the 1987 crash so it’s been a while um so I think like you think I that’s what I that’s what I strive to too is make sure that you get access to everything that you know professional traders have had for years. But I also think it’s equally as important that you learn from each other and the best way to do that is by giving you tools like social so that you can you know you can collaborate with each other and if there’s best practices this isn’t a zero sum game you can all be winning you know in this scary market you know loses. Um, so, so I think that social is going to be really powerful for people, particularly if if I’m newer to the market because it, you know, there’s a learning curve. So, you you need to catch up and and figure out how to navigate markets, particularly volatile ones. And I think uh, social is going to be really powerful there. You know, it reminds me I had a couple of people come up to me and say, you know, this this is a great event. It felt like you invited a bunch of your friends over and we’re all your friends. Um, and were some of those friends um out late in your living room? I think they were I think they were up late trading um or you know enjoying that giant rocket which uh I was happy that I I got to spend time seeing that. But um yeah, I think that the best value at this event which I encourage people to keep trying to capture is making introductions with each other. I know a lot of people are still in WhatsApp groups and and signal groups from prior years. We we’re we’re trying to make it easy and conducive to uh create real relationships cuz this isn’t a typical business networking conference. You’re all here because you want to be here. Um so this is a great opportunity to find others that care about trading and markets and learning just as much as yourselves. Yeah. But I think um you you know there’s all kinds of sessions and Obie is going to come out in a minute and talk to you know walk you through everything that’s going to happen you know over the course of the day. But before we do that I think we want to we want to thank some of our sponsors and of course thank you for all being here. Um a lot of you have made trips from that’s first question I always ask when you know when I when I meet everybody is where where did you come in from? And man it’s all over the place. It’s it’s kind of cool. Um, but the sponsors we want to thank, as you can see up here, uh, the SIBO, CME, NASDAQ, State Street, AWS, Eyesshares, Direction, Sage, Tip Ranks, Van, and Roundill are all out there, and they all have uh boosts. Some of them were I couldn’t believe how how long the lines were to get to to uh some of those u sponsors yesterday. It was kind of exciting. I didn’t know what they were giving away, but I I wanted to get in line. No, these guys are um they they’ve been really amazing and we partner with them on uh all kinds of products. I mean, a lot of the products we announced yesterday were really made possible with partnership by by these sponsors. So, a lot of what we’re doing here is we’re we’re not just bringing people together, but we’re building infrastructure for what trading looks like in the future. And um I think that involves companies big and small. And I think increasingly Robin Hood is is a part of global trading infrastructure in a way that we weren’t maybe five years nexus. We’re the nexus. Yes. And and one other thing I would say what I love is when people say I love all these things you’re doing. This is so helpful. What I would like to see because we get a lot of great ideas from you. You’re the people that are the ones that are oftentimes telling us, hey, you know, if I had the ability to do XYZ in addition to this, it would be really powerful. Those are great things for us to hear. And you could tell any one of us. Abashek’s right over there. I’ll give you a cell phone. Call him 24/7. I’ve been pointing people to you. Oh, I had someone come up with very explicit future trading feedback and uh Okay. I was like, you know who you should talk to? And they said, uh, I know you’re going to point me to Q. Yeah. Yeah. He’s right there. I like it, by the way. I love it. So, please, I want to hear I want to hear from you. We all do. Creating futures backstage. I was That’s where we get all our you get our good uh that’s where we get a lot of our good ideas. So, with that, I think uh we’re going to bring out Obie, who is our MC for the day. I think we’re going to bring out Obie.
Hey, thank you guys. Welcome to day two. Enjoy it. See you. Thank you. By the way, he’s a big White Sox fan, so he’s kind of excited. It’s a good day yesterday. It’s a good day. Thanks, guys. Thanks, Vlad. Thanks, Q. Good morning, everyone. How we doing? That’s We can do better than that. How we doing? There we go. I know you guys had some fun last night. I’m Michael Obacina, better known as Obie. I’m the head of education here at Robin Hood and I will be your MC and master of ceremonies here on the main stage today. You’ll see me throughout the day keeping things moving, making sure you know what’s happening across Summit. And trust me, there is a lot happening. So, make sure you know that schedule. For those watching online at the the main stage live stream, we’ll stay up during breaks. So, if you need to step away, grab some coffee, come back, set an alarm, we’ll keep that live stream link running all day on YouTube, popping in out uh as you’re able to. All right, let’s walk through the day starting right here on Main Stage. We’re going to kick things off here in a moment with a live edition of the Risk Reversal Podcast. They’ll be discussing the state of the markets, everything from the AI trade in the midterms to other forces shaping markets into year end. These guys are my favorite. They’re fantastic. Uh then we’re going to get hands-on with those new a agents that we saw last night uh in the keynote. Uh Robin Hood’s VP of product Abashek who was sitting about right here last night. Uh we’re going to work with uh professional trader Chris Abdul Msia and two of our app store partners spot gamma and Quiver Quantitative. They’re going to be going through some examples of building some options trades using agents. It’s going to be really cool. And then we take a short break at 9:45. Uh, and at 10:00 a.m. that’s when all the other stages open, podcast and the trading lab, which I know a lot of you experienced yesterday. Uh, and then when we return, Guyadami is going to sit down with State Street’s Matt Bardellini for an ETF State of the Union. And then Q will make his way back on the stage with the CEO of Bruce Markets to take us behind the scenes of the 247 trading infrastructure that was also announced last night. And then last but not least, before lunch, uh our friend Kevin Avery from Chatwood Traders, a very popular trading podcast, uh is going to sit down with uh Geneva Trading CEO Rob Kramer, CME Group’s Craig Buick, and I’ll be on that panel as well. And we’re going to follow a futures trade from your screen to the exchange to the market maker on the other side. It’s going to be a really fun conversation. Then we break for lunch, but please don’t even think about leaving early because we’ve stacked some of our best sessions in the afternoon. Starting uh on the other side of lunch at 1:00, we’re going to do a session on the midterms using the prediction markets hub and we’ll be joined by a former presidential campaign manager, a leading pollster, and our friend Danny Moses to build a trading plan for the 2026 midterms. And then Robin Hood Ventures, if you guys have heard of that, uh we’re gonna have a panel with uh does anyone know Kathy Wood? That’s right. Kathy’s gonna be here joined by our very own CFO uh Shiv Verma and head of Robin Hood Ventures, Sarah Pinto. And that’ll be moderated by our good friend Dan Nathan, who you’re about to see on stage. And then, and this might be one of my favorite sessions of the day, we turn inward to the mental game of trading. Jared Tendler, who is a mental game coach, is going to go inside the mistakes that our brains somehow convince us to make when we’re in the middle of a trade and like, “Oh, this is a good idea.” And we’re going to have a little session on how to improve our mental approach to trading. So, please stick around for that. I’ve seen the rehearsals. I’ve worked with Jared on this. It’s going to be a lot of fun. And then we wrap the day and summit with my favorite tradition for Hood Summit. And this is lessons from a legend. We’ve done this every year. This year, uh, SIBO’s JJ Kahan sits down with a true professional and legend of the retail trading world, Tom Sausnoff. Has anyone heard of Tom? Yeah. Uh, he’s he’s well known in the industry. I’ve actually started my career working for Tom. So, we’re happy to have him here. And then to close things out, we’re going to bring Vlad and Q back on at the end of the day, wrap it up, and send you guys to happy hour. So, that’s it for the main stage. Fully packed day. Um, but as you guys experienced yesterday, we’ve got the trading lab all the way in the other side of the convention center. Uh, it’s smaller, more intimate, built around more hands-on live trading workshops. We’re going to have sessions on options, technical analysis. We’re going to explore futures trading, and then you may want to sneak early for this one. The guys that are coming on stage here, the the famous big short traders, they’re going to do a master class on how to trade from the short side. And then uh of course uh schedule-wise the trading lab starts every hour on the hour uh starting at 10:00 a.m. and finishing at 2. Seats are limited. So if there’s a session you want to be uh there and and and be involved with, get there early, get a good seat. And then don’t forget the podcast stage. All day long we’ve got live conversations with traders, industry leaders, uh across markets, AI, options, futures, crypto, technology. So there’s a lot going on. And if you’re torn between what you want to see, don’t worry. Everything’s getting recorded. So if there’s something that h you know what, I can’t decide. Pick the one that you want to be involved in because we built Q&A into every one of these sessions. So you’ll see Mike’s here. You’ll see Mike’s over in the other stages. Get involved, ask questions. uh don’t be afraid to get up uh because we want you guys to learn from these experts and there’s no better way than asking them uh right in front of them. And then uh of course besides the stages, you guys have already experienced this yesterday, but we’ve got Brain Date. We’ve got the Robin Hood NASCAR out there. Take a picture. Uh and then uh you know, rest your feet, get some coffee, hang out in our sponsored lounges. Don’t forget lunch is at noon. Happy hour starts at 4:30. So, my wish and and my hope is that you guys get out there, ask questions, meet somebody new, make the most of your day, cuz this is jam-packed with trading, education, community, uh, and of course, we like to have a little fun. So, once again, are we ready to go? All right. Fantastic. There’s really only one way to start a day like this, and we got to talk markets. Uh so please welcome to the stage Robin Hood’s chief investment officer Steph Gild fame big short investors and founders of Seawolf Capital Vincent Daniel and Porter Collins and your friends in mine co-founders of Risk Reversal Media and co-hosts of CNBC’s Fast Money Dan Nathan and Guyadami. This is Risk Reversal Live at HoodSummit. Let’s give them a hand.
Morning people. Hey Obie, don’t leave yet. Just wait one second. A round of applause for Michael Ouchi. I mean, unbelievable. Put this together. You’re going to see a lot of Obie. Obie is a man. We love him. And thanks for having us here, folks. We’re excited, clearly. Uh I’m energized. I was here last night. I did not get a seat. I sat in the back. It was full. And that’s a tribute to all of you. There was a saying at Goldman Sachs uh when we tried to put on trades, take a partner. And that basically meant, you know, if you have an idea about something, bounce it off somebody else and let them sort of look at it and see it through a lens that maybe you didn’t look at it through. And that really helps. And if you think about the community you’ve built here at Robin Hood, you can do that in a material way. And given what I saw last night, it’s going to make it a lot easier. So without further ado, I have an amazing panel here. You will notice Danny Moses is not here. He didn’t want to sit next to Vinnie. He said it’s too much. You’ll see Danny later, but the Porter and the Vinnie are here along with my dear friend Stephanie Gild and obviously Dan Nathan. So Steph, I’m going to start with you. Obviously the topics are energy, the topics are interest rates, and the topics are AI. That’s what’s dominating, but there are other things going on. So if you’re looking across the spectrum, and you do amazing work, by the way, you’re really fortunate to have Steph guild here at Robin Hood. You know, what sort of stands out to you over the last few weeks? Um, I think obviously the things you said and the things that worry me about it is just like the the trickle effect from the higher costs. Um, and what that does to the consumer, what that does to the cost for businesses to run themselves. Um, but I also think that um, you’re kind of seeing it play out in the markets where there used to be much more breath and now the breath has come in where it’s concentrated in the LA, you know, the kind of largest names. Um, and that that’s also that’s probably how it’s playing in to uh, you know, the largest names are not being as impacted by it more recently. And and actually, there’s something I was thinking about with it, which is it used to be that like if you’re worried about growth, you could just go buy the largest tech companies and kind of hide out in there. And I’m not sure that’s actually where you should hide out anymore. But I think that instinct or reflex is still exists in the market. And that’s maybe why you’re seeing um the mag seven catch up and there being much less breath right now. We play this. Any fast money fans out there, don’t lie if you’re not, but if we make it to January 20 years, anybody ever seen this show? Somebody please say you can yell and scream. By the way, um we have Mike. So, at the end of this uh session, to the extent you have questions, we’re going to ask people to sort of go down either aisle. We’ll leave some time for Q&A, but we play this game on fast money. If I had told you six months ago the following would be happening and stuff I’m going to go back to you. Six months ago I said to you oil is going to be either side of $95 10ear yields going to be approaching 5 and a4%. A war is going to be lasting for five or 6 months in the Middle East. And then I said okay given those things I said where’s the S&P? And I will tell you what I would have said 6500 if not lower. Yet here we are couple% from an all-time high. Does that surprise you in any way? Can we can we add in the Fed’s been hiking rates, too. I’m going to add in, by the way, the Fed’s been hiking rates. Thank you, Porter, for that. Um, I I would have actually I my target was around the 6,500 with a give or take 100 points around that. Um, so I am actually really surprised that we’ve been able to bear through a war that hasn’t ended, oil prices that are not going down, and rates that continue to go higher. Although the rates thing I’m not at all surprised about because I feel like I’ve been saying that they should be higher for a while. Um, and I think as a I’m one thing I think is like that’s helping offset that is that we do actually have growth. It may be um fueled by capital spending that could be at risk, but it is there and that’s the only thing I think that’s been offsetting the higher rates. Vinnie, nothing surprises you. I’ve been around you long enough. You’re very measured. But again, all the things we talk about it is to me it is surprising the resilience of the market. Now maybe it’s against the backdrop of earnings growth which is supporting but the earnings growth is seemingly coming in a very specific area. So thoughts on that? Few things. Uh the market breath right now is terrible as as we’ve discussed. Uh let’s also keep in mind we’re running 5% fiscal deficits. So that creates revenue growth for somebody out there somewhere and like you said it’s very concentrated but how much longer I always ask can this last where we have such a bifurcated so the market breath is horrific and it can resolve itself one of two ways uh it’s either going to resolve itself where the cap weighted names are going to come down or the names that have gotten crushed I mean take a gander as any hopefully no one has been trading this and if you’re short it great But take a look at the stock McDonald’s. Just look at the chart. It’s horrible. Right? So I look at what’s causing some of this market breath. And I always go back to market structure, right? So think about everyone who works. You get your W2, right? You’re usually saving money from that W2. It’s going to target date funds, which are cap weighted funds. So, there’s a flow of money going into the market that just goes to 10 or 20 names. And the rest of the names in the S&P, while they’re getting some drips and drabs of money, they’re not getting anywhere near the amount of money Apple’s getting. Just you put a dollar in the market. What is it? 8 to 10% is going to Apple, 8 to 10%’s going in Nvidia. And this is just money you’re getting every Friday from your salary straight to the market. It doesn’t have a brain. Doesn’t know what it’s buying. It’s just structured to go there. So, I think the structure is holding up this market for the time being. So, I’m gonna I’m gonna put a pin in that, which is a phrase that I’m reticent to use, but I will this morning. I’m going to go to Porter real quick. You guys, when I say you guys, you and Vinnie and Danny Mosers, who is floating around, get labeled um perma bears, which is not true. You’ve both all three of you have found opportunities in a lot of different things, extraordinary ones. Energy has been a place that you guys were early and in arts in world you were early and right typically it’s early and wrong. Still opportunities and energy here regardless of what you think about the underlying commodity in crude oil. Well, you know, I think this war has forever changed the structure and dynamic of the energy market, right? I I think that um buyers of of natural gas and and crude and LNG are going to be very reticent to to go to the you know rely on the Middle East just because there’s so much turmoil, right? That’s just been the the history of it. And I think, you know, the structure of those markets are going to be changed for a long time. And you know, hopefully the the price of oil does come back down. You know, I think the the the asymmetry in the energy trade was much better uh when everyone, you know, hated it and oil prices were very low. But I would point out that, you know, there hasn’t really been much of any multiple expansion of the energy names. It’s just been pure profit. Um, you know, profits are up and and people are discounting obviously the the the curve on the the oil. So, I don’t think there’s a lot of expectations built in. You know, the average investor still probably doesn’t own oil stocks. uh you know the index sure doesn’t it’s I think it’s two or 3% of the index as well. So I think that a lot of these big energy names are great places to you know own for uh dividends and and uh cash flows. So yeah, I think it’s it’s it’s a nice piece of people’s portfolios. Moves have been extraordinary. Some of the refining stocks are trading like biotech names. And you know, people look at this and say that’s unsustainable. But if you think about the backdrop and the earnings growth and and it all goes to the bottom line, seemingly despite the moves, there’s still room in these things. Well, this is this is kind of the one of the reasons we were so bullish on energy is that if you look at what happened to ESG, they were retiring all these refineries for a long time. Here we’re in the we’re in the the energy capital world here in Houston and you know the the world hated energy still does right and so that they’ve been retiring refineries and now in Russia we’re blowing up uh refineries and um you know there’s been lots of uh fires you know whether there’s vandalism or whatever in a lot of different refiners and so just the the the supply demand there’s a lot of demand still and there’s and the supply is shrinking just you know that that’s that’s why you know Marathon stock goes up every day right probably one of the best performing stocks in the market you know it’s amazing the three best things that happened to energy in my opinion over the last it’s called five or six years the prior administration this is not political they were very clear about their want to sort of put the energy business into the ground when front month crude oil traded down to minus $40 a barrel that sort of was a wakeup call and what you just said ESG and all those things force these companies to sort of take a hard look at their businesses and sort of operate better. Steph, I know you do some work in the energy space. Is Is there an accuracy to that? No, I I think it’s right. And if you also think about like you said back in 2014 when oil prices dropped a ton, like it was another wakeup call for energy companies. I think if you always kind of take a bigger step back, I like investing in in sectors that have been through it already and had to like realize how to be efficient in a not great environment for them. And that’s why I think like energy can do well going forward because the demand is still there and they know how to run businesses without very much help um or or resources. I’ve not forgotten about Dan Nathan. We started a company about six years ago. Any risk reversal media fans out there? You can raise your hand if there’s got to be somebody. By the way, you right there, Junior Amanda is doing great. By the way, if you see her, it’s her birthday. So, please wish her a happy birthday. But Dan Nathan, I’ve gotten to sit next to on Fast Money for the last 17 or 18 years. Um, and he’s obviously not the voice of skepticism, but he’s somebody that brings up things that a lot of the people out there don’t really bring up. And I will tell you, Dan brought up early and correctly what was going on in sort of these private equity names. and they although they bounced they’re sort of back on a trajectory lower and this has been a concern of yours now for a while. So obviously not financials in the historical sense but financials the importance of what’s going on in the world. Yeah and I think um you know Vinnie Porter Danny have been all over this. You guys have drawn correlations between the thing that everybody is talking about and what are some of the second derivative trades about that and I I got I’ve learned that gut from you guys. You know when you think about how this infrastructure build has been financed over the course of three or four years I think it’s very instructive to see who are some of the beneficiaries right out of the gate right and then essentially who are being dragged along and we can do the industrial stuff at at another point but the financing of this is the most important point and you go back to 20 I don’t know 19 2021 when Microsoft one of the best credits in the world it has a better credit than the US government invested $13 billion into a startup, OpenAI. They own 27% of that company. Just think about that for that sort of investment. Now, they could raise as much debt as they need to to build out whatever they want to do, right? Some of the other companies that they were investing in were having a harder problem or harder time doing that, but they were leveraging off their investors and ability to do that. So then you take it a step further and you say, “All right, Microsoft can use their cash flow. They use their balance sheet. they can use their ability to raise debt. But then where did some of the other folks have had to get a bit more creative, right? They had to go into the private equity, private credit really space. Those guys get funded, right, by a lot of the banks, insurance companies. I mean, the list goes on and on. So here we are 3, four years into this Microsofts, the major hyperscalers. They’ve used a lot of their cash flow. They’ve leveraged their balance sheets, that sort of thing. So where do they go? They go from the guys who make fees, right? Lending into this sort of stuff. And so that’s where you get to these private equity credit, what whatever you want to call them, alternative lenders. They have traded really poorly in many ways. I think they have been sort of the canary in the coal mine for how this trade might go. And these are great companies and I know you guys know this. Apollo and KKR and Blackstone and the list goes on and on. The stocks trade like dog [ __ ] okay? They just don’t trade particularly well. And so I don’t know how you can look at the performance of those, look at all the exposure that they have, look down the chain of where they get their capital, how they get their returns, and say to yourself, “This is all going to go well in a straight line.” So last thing I’ll just say, a KKR strategist, it was in the FT, I literally just read it 15 minutes ago. He’s talking about concentration risk. He’s talking about how basically the concentration in investment grade debt in the US for AI related stuff is 6.3%. That is double the 30-year average of any one sector. And that company which has lots of I guess toes in the water all around this trade are basically saying are one part of that organization be careful of concentration because if things go sideway we’re going to have some problems. So Vinnie, how important are interest rates in this whole thing? reporter correctly told me that the Fed is on this rate height cycle it appears and whether you think it’s a good thing or a bad thing. That is what’s going on right now. Bond market is telling a story that the equity market either chooses not to listen to or just doesn’t think it’s a big deal right now. Well, when I think about why rates are rising and there’s a lot of reasons, I just go with D. All of the above. All the above. All of the above. Right. whether it’s higher than expected inflation, a crowding out element that while the the treasury needs to refinance a ton of paper, AI has a lot of debt requirements and requirements of debt issuance. Uh you also have an interesting dynamic associated with who’s buying treasuries, how levered they are, and as volatility increases, they need to degrow. So that is happening as well. Um I every single reason you give me it really doesn’t matter. Higher rates really hurts markets at the end of the day. And so we keep saying and of course oh I forgot one of the biggest ones which causes a lot of the inflation which is this war right this this war and the lack of supply of energy and oil and diesel which finally f funnels itself into the economy with higher costs which requires higher inflation. So I say, well, in order for markets to really resolve itself, getting back to this market breath and all the other stocks that were not the the non20 AI related names that are going down, how in the world do they go up? You have to get rates down. But how do you do that, right? Well, the first thing you need to do is to end the war and that would decline. Again, this is nonpartisan. I’m just using market related uh stuff. So, I think we’re probably done with rates being at zero or 1% like that’s we were talking about it in the back. That’s kind of the anomaly. But if rates were to rally 50 basis points for the right reasons, you can see some interesting things that happen in the market. But you need a catalyst. I don’t think it’s just going to happen just because it happens. What is the catalyst though? as you said, I mean, it’s it’s a war ending potentially or or it’s a stock market that sort of rolls over in a meaningful way and then maybe you do see a flight to quality in the form of the bond market, which is historically something that happens. It’s two ways, right? You end the war and then we could have a disinflationary kind of mini boom. I don’t think it’ll last super long, but it’ll last long enough to be a tradeable uh event. Or you have the other way, right? And the other way is what you said, which is rates eventually start biting into everything. Perhaps this AI capex boom by next year, the rate of change turns negative. And then all of a sudden, we’re going to have a more recessionary environment that’s pervasive in the economy. And if that is the case, then you’ll probably get rates lower because inflation will turn into disinflation and potentially deflation. Cord, you guys obviously do a lot of work in a lot of different areas. is Latin America is something that we talked about over the last couple days. There’s an election in Brazil on Sunday. Um the Brazil ETF, the EWZ had a great move earlier in the year. It’s backed off a little bit. Opportunities in Latin America if you’re trading, if you’re playing our home game here. Well, you know, Vide and I are worry about everything and and if I look around the US, there’s not a ton of bright spots, you know, like I I you know, I’m trying to look for idiosyncratic stories that go up, but like you know, if I if I look at a from a macro perspective, I go to Latin America, you’ve had a big uh shift in terms of regimes, Colombia, Brazil, Peru, um that all moved more conservative And what that basically means is liberalizing the economies, opening them up, allowing them to to to grow faster. And you know, they they’re called emerging markets. And usually emerging markets are people worry about them because they have more debt. Well, they actually have less debt to GDP than the United States does. And that basically all these uh developed economies do. And so you have better growth. you know, the the the earnings multiples are at least half of what you see in in these markets. No one’s really looking at them. Um, and you know, they’re very well-run companies and and we were talking earlier about companies or or countries that have been through periods of long hard times. Well, this is a this is, you know, this is case number one in, you know, Brazil or whatever that they’ve it’s interest rates are 14%. I imagine if the interest rates the Fed raised rates to 14% I think times would be a little harder here and so that’s why I look at opportunity there’s you know the election is this Sunday if if you see you know a move more conservative in Bolsson winning I think that’s really an opportunity to to say hey like growth is going to be a lot better inflation can come down and rates can come down and you can have a a good cycle right we don’t the you know I think that we worry about rates going up here in in Brazil I don’t know rates can work and rates go 14 to 11 that’s a pretty big bull cycle that’s going to occur there so that’s that’s the stuff that we look for sort of asymmetry and that that’s so you know I think I would u look at Monday or Sunday night’s election and say you know is this a tradable event that’s what I would look for Vinnie you’re a master at finding names that nobody’s ever really talked about or heard of until everybody’s talking about and hearing about them. Are there any of those names out there now? It’s, you know, if you want to go to Latin America because there are a lot I mean you think about Brazil resources, banks, minerals, I mean the whole mining stocks, I mean it runs sort of the gamut there. I’ll give one name. You you guys are very familiar with CME, right? In terms of a name in a company. Uh what if you can own the CME of Brazil, right? Uh it’s B3. They’re the Brazilian exchange. they they they kind of have a monopoly in in many respects. Uh Ebidot margins are 60 70%. And stock trades at a fraction of the multiples that typical exchanges trade. So if if this election goes stock has done reasonably well, uh if the election goes well, we believe it’ll it’ll really uh pick up. So a name like B3, a name like XP that we recently bought, which is kind of like the Brazilian Charles Schwab, right? So, a lot of the things that people Not as buying Robin Hood. What? Not as good as Robin Hood. Of course. Correct. The Brazilian. It’s the Brazilian Robin Hood. It’s not as good as Robin Hood. Indeed, it doesn’t have the technology. So, um, so to me, we’re sort of buying the Brazilian equivalents of things in the United States that trade at much higher multiples. Just out of curiosity, process for the people here, all traders, is it just rigor that gets you to these names? Is it just doing the work? a natural curiosity because I’m sure a lot of people are saying I say it and I’m supposed to have been done this for the last 40 years like how do people like Vinnie and Porter find these things. Yeah. Well, first off, forgive me guy. Me and you have a lot of gray hair, right? So, we’ve been doing this for a while. So, that that helps to a certain extent. We we’ve kind of seen a lot of things. Uh Porter and I like to start with a thematic of where we think the world is going and then from there we find things from the bottom up. And then after that, it’s just I mean, I stupidly like to sit in balance sheets and and look at these things and study them and and be challenged by it. Even even with names when you’re wrong, it was like, “Wow, this stock sucks and we own it, but that was a fun analysis I just did.” Uh, and I know that’s weird, but it’s it’s just the way I’m built. Uh, well, you might say weird. I I love it, too. I love being a nerd. Yeah. Well, that’s what I was going to ask you, Steph. It’s about the process and obviously you have an extraordinary process. So walk us through, you know, how you sit down during the day and sort of come up with the thesis you come up with. It’s not too different. I would say we we actually start in Robin Hood strategies with a quantitative process first because I kind of know that sometimes like my own opinion can get in the way of good, you know, fundamentals or data or finding something interesting. So we have uh proprietary factors that we build that kind of give us like what are the value stocks, what are the growth stocks, what are the quality stocks. Um and that’s where we fish. But then I’ll also have kind of a a thematic and I I read a lot like I I read articles and listen to podcasts, some finance, some not finance. obviously listen to risk reversal, but um but I also like listening to things that are not financial, but like people will bring up things that they’re doing, things that they’re talking about. I also have kids that will tell me like what people are doing. Um my daughter asked me for a JBL speaker the other day and I was like should I look into who makes those and like um and she loves Starbucks but um there like I kind of start forming a view of the world taking all of that in and looking for things that like not everyone’s talking about yet and try to pair that with the quantitative kind of bottom up process. Dan goes down the rabbit hole every day of you know the information all the different things you read and to your credit we talk about sort of cyclicality and I want to come back to that but valuations matter and obviously some stocks trade at ridiculous valuations but then you look at a name like Nvidia which last I look is trading at about 19 times next year’s numbers 100% earnings growth 100% revenue growth broader market probably trades at 22 times to the extent that they even have peers probably half of the valuation. I ask out loud, why is that? Why do you think is it an opportunity or is it a warning flag? Well, I mean, let’s go back 26 years, right? And um I I did a podcast on Friday, risk reversal podcast. I’m just going to kind of give it a little push here. You guys have to go listen to Jim Chenos, who is the guy who found the Enron fraud. Like to us, he’s like that guy. Okay. Um we love him. He’s a friend of ours. and then another guy named Gary Marcus who is a very um prolific AI skeptic but an academic and we had the two of them together and you know Gary brought up Nvidia but Jim really kind of nailed it. If you are Nvidia and you were at the center of this entire ecosystem and they kept on using the you know if you’re selling shovels in a gold rust that is Nvidia they’ve been able to have margins that like we’ve never seen a semiconductor company ever have. They have these moes they have this crazy market share they have everything. All right. So Jim’s point was if you believe everything that we’ve just talked about in this whole conversation, okay, about the technical aspects of it, the mark market aspects of it, the all the opportunities and your Nvidia, why would anybody who is dependent on your chips and your allocation and your I mean the list goes on and on. Why should that trade at a higher multiple than the company? And I and I’ll put it to maybe Porter and Vinnie like like think about that. You could be skeptical of the circular financing. You could be skeptical of the um competition that’s coming. You could be skeptical of just, you know, them being this Cisco. This is the thing going back to 1999 of this whole sort of trade. And when it kind of goes pear-shaped, they’re going to be ground zero for it. But in the meantime, the stock has gone sideways for 6 months. It’s back towards those highs. They seem to have to pull up every rabbit out of a hat. Now, this new $150 billion um buyback that they’re actually instituting. It’s not like, hey, we have this dry powder if the stock comes back in. So, they’re making a judgment about the valuation of their stock. And I’m just curious how you guys think about that because Jim’s point is a great one. You can take all of these qualitative inputs from someone like Gary Marcus, but Jim’s actually not thinking about that. He’s thinking about the quantitative aspects of this. Vin, good point. And my perspective is they’re right. And I look at names if if if I thought that the AI narrative trade capex cycle whatever we want to call it is is going to have a negative rate of change. I’m not thinking about Nvidia as the first thing to short. I’m not I’m thinking more of the very heavily indebted uh names some of the data centers where the business models are questionable to begin with. Right? I would look towards that to short more. So, I’m in complete agreement with with with Jim on how the direction I would trade this if I felt like the AI trade was on its last legs. Yeah. But, by the way, they’re the ones that have the pricing power, too, right? So, they’re invest in a NeoCloud. They turn around and buy their chips at a 77 gross margin for Nvidia, you know, understanding that this is for them. They got to get it while the getting’s good, right? Like, and it’s been good, Porter. So like help us think about that because that is the most like you’re not going for Nvidia. If anything, Nvidia might be a great pair stray. It might be that hedge against shorting this stuff that are their customers that have the questional unit economics. So we’ve gone we’ve gone bearish, you know, on Nvidia on on the AI trade. We’re talking, you know, the risks. We’re talking about risks. You know, I will say that I probably underestimated how powerful AI would be in my life and and and the the quick adoption everywhere. You know, you you’re seeing, you know, we saw the presentation last night. It’s being incorporated into everything. And I think that, you know, in one way it’s it’s scary, right? You know, are we able to sustain, you know, the job growth? We talked about on our uh Substack. It’s called what are we doing? I talked about um accounting jobs, you know, are they going to replace accounting jobs with AI? And the answer is probably yes, right? And so I I worry about that and I think that AI is probably going to be more powerful than most of us think. So um that’s at odds with the business model and the financing of of all this stuff cuz you know two companies Open AI and Anthropic have $2.5 trillion in debt. It’s a lot of debt for companies that don’t make any money, that really don’t have any prospects for making money. So, I I think something needs to change, right? We’re going to all going to need to pay a lot more for compute for these companies to be profitable. Um, you know, I I use Gemini. I pay 20 bucks a month. I’m not a power user of this stuff and I think it’s amazing, right? But I’m not paying you know when companies start replacing a lot of humans uh with you know $100,000 of compute power um that’s when you know I think the profitability of these companies will really take off but that’s obviously scary right and so I think we’re at a very interesting point of the world and the markets are seeing the trepidation the markets are um very uneven right now and I think that’s the way I see it too. I you know so Steph when historically when cyclical stocks are their cheapest that’s the time to avoid them and conversely when they get expensive is cyclicality even a thing anymore because if you listen if you watch daytime business television you’ll hear a lot of people say it’s different this time famous last words um the I do think it’s a little bit different this time I I I think it used to be much easier to analyze the market and the economy and they were a little closer together. And I think now we’re on and I talked about this yesterday on another podcast here, but like I think we’re on two timelines. And I think we’re on a AI timeline that is tech enabled and the life that we might all be living. But then there’s another timeline. I think about my parents like they were like, “Yeah, we used chatbt once.” It’s like there there’s a whole lot of people out there that AI has not entered their world. Like the progressive commercial. Yeah. Yeah. Like your parents. Um so I I just think there’s like there’s still a lot more growth coming because there is a lot of people in the world. There’s a it’s what is it like 2% of the population that are actually participating in this and it is really hard to change behavior. Like it takes a while to change behavior. It change oh takes a while to change behavior inside organizations to use this AI. So that’s why I think we’re kind of on two timelines. So the timeline that used to be the timeline um and this is like where you said I used to use timelines use the word bifurcated. Yep. That’s that’s not doing well. Consumer names are not doing well. 20% of the largest 1000 stocks are down more than 15% and it’s all some software companies like in it. So accounting is over and then you know in Adobe and then it’s like consumer names and some of them have stock specific stories but some of them are just because consumer sentiment is down like people don’t think not a lot of people in the bigger world think things are great but then I feel like a lot of us here think things are better because we are in that other timeline of seeing that growth. So I I think that’s almost what the market is struggling with right now too under the hood even though the VIX is like not high um because it’s it’s coming together. The one other thing I wanted to say about Nvidia is that I wrote a piece about Nvidia becoming a bank and if a bank takes deposits and lends them out and then lends their name and then often concentrates in sectors Nvidia is doing all of that. Um, even though they say they don’t have financing, like you said, they they lend money out and that’s on the or order of like, you know, it’s not that big compared to their revenue. It’s like $500 billion from what I could find deep in the disclosures. Um, but it’s I think it’s probably more than that. And they’re the most incentivized to keep things like that going. And that’s why I think this can go in a circular motion for longer than we think should. Yeah. Um, just by the way, um, if you guys got questions, there’s three mics here. Um, I wanted to make one point. Guy, you asked about process and you know, last year we were at the hood summit and they rolled out Cortex and we got to see the blue guy with uh, Vlad’s voice last night which was pretty cool, but they updated a lot of these products and you know, when you talk about what are some of these second derivative things? So last week when Muse came out or two weeks ago, did you guys see all the companies that have subscriptions? They all got killed, right? like like literally so all of a sudden you could use an agent to go into all your crap and find the stuff that you’re not using anymore subscriptions and kind of log out of them or unsubscribe from them those tools I think are the things that give you the ability to find those other trades and I think that digging into those all right guy you played host we didn’t get any guy opinions here and I will say this because you guys know guy well he doesn’t love to kind of take any recognition for anything that he’s done well in his life you have had uniquely. You and I have had the benefit. Steph’s been on with us in the podcast a lot. You guys have been. We’ve had amazing strategists, investors, analysts. Um, you’ve been steadfast in rates going higher. We don’t have to dig into that much. But here we are. We’re at this level. It’s broken out to a 5year, multi-year high. Forget trading yields right now. If we were to see a pullback, and there’s a whole host of things that you just laid out, Vinnie, and we could have these kind of What would you trade? What would you do away from yields in the stock market that you think is a great way to reflect you know yields coming back below 5 yields come in from let’s say 5 and a/4ish where we are now let’s say call it 4 and 3/4 so we can do that math you have to say okay what is the backdrop for that to happen but then I say to myself okay what has higher yields created a headwind for that is still a structural trade and it comes back to gold Vinnie I think you probably agree with me on this one gold’s obviously had really difficult couple of months had a bounce I don’t know let’s call it mid August or so but it’s pulling back now I think solely on the back of yields being higher I’m of the belief you know if the bond market continues to erode there will be a point in time where that becomes bullish but under that scenario I think that’s when gold is going to really flourish so I I think the gold story is intact Vinnie the fact that the Netherlands a few weeks ago or a month or so ago announced that they were repatriating their gold I think it was 80 tons of gold. I know that’s a wonky story. I think that’s a big story that came on the heels of France doing it earlier this year and I think it was 14 or so years ago. The Germans did it as well. That’s a that is a telling sign. So in what Dan just laid out, Vinnie, I say the gold the gold market’s going to work in a material way. Thought Oh, go ahead, Porter. Well, you know, we’re a little bit older than than the uh Robin Hood crowd, but you know, I think they see the same thing we do with Bitcoin. And you know, Bitcoin has been in a bare market for quite some time. It’s sort of peeking its head out of the out of the closet here and trying to, you know, do a little better. And so I think it’s sort of similar. It’s the debasement trade, right? We’re not going to be able to pay this debt back with, you know, uh, what the government’s doing. We’re running 5% fiscal deficits. As far as I can see, we’re going to have to print the money. that’s the only way that we’re going to be able to pay for social security and and everything else going on. And so I think this debasement trade, whether you choose Bitcoin or choose gold or choose the gold miners, you know, I think that’s a trade that will be here for a long time. Ben, yes. Um, it’s also a question of what is causing the rates to go down 40 50 basis points. Is that somewhat sustainable? Does is inflation coming down with it? And I’m talking real inflation, not fagazy CPI prints. I’m saying we actually get a reduction. Like if oil went from a 100 bucks to 75 bucks, keep coming back to this war. That would cause a chain chain effect on inflation. And as a result, I think there would be even more things. Yes, gold. Yes, Bitcoin. I agree with that. But there would probably be even more things to buy over a 6 to9month period. I’m looking down in the crowd again. If you have questions, the microphones are there, but Steph, we have a few minutes left. We haven’t talked politics, nor do I want to talk politics, but there is an election coming up in the next 35 or so days. Historically, elections are market moving. Have you done any work around that? And I’m going to come to you, sir, but go ahead Steph. Um, I not very much other than to know that usually markets will rally post an election because knowledge is calming. Um, but I for this one I just I feel like we end up being in this like uncomfortable middle maybe because less will get done in Congress and um so much getting done right now. Well, I think they were try I think they were trying to get stuff done. Um and and now I’m I’m just afraid that the attention will turn toward like going after your enemies and I don’t want that. like I would rather it be like just focus on getting stuff done and instead it will be more of like ridiculousness. So um and but there will be more support for uh I think data center pullback like spending on that and putting in regulations on that kind of thing. So um I’m a little worried about like the AI infrastructure not all of AI but because of that. Um but otherwise I I do think knowledge ends up usually creating a rally in the short term. Sir um uh really what what you say Steph about timelines. I think uh I see it every day with my family. You know I was having this conversation with my sister where she’s like AI is going to be doom. You know it’s everybody’s going to be unemployed and things like that. But then you see Jensen in the all in uh podcast talking about um how people is saying things like in 6 months all entry jobs will disappear and then it doesn’t happen and then zero accountability on those kind of things, right? Um you see big tech companies hiring again. So, how do you have conversations with those people who feel like AI is going to um kind of like destroy everything, but you see that reality doesn’t match that and how you face that conversation. And I will say it um for I think like movies like Terminator haven’t um helped because I think like you know if if AI becomes physical then like I saw this meme the other day and I said this to my friend. I’m like I’m I always say please and thank you to my agent um because if they do become physical they’ll be nice to me um in the end of it. But I think uh I mean just sharing the data points that you just shared to me I think is is actually the right way to hit it head on. Like I understand why it’s scary because it feels like a person that can come in and just do whatever you were doing before, but I I personally have not seen it that way like you. I feel like it’s made us do more with less in that I do I I can do other things while things are happening. Like we run reporting now using AI and we’ve uncovered stuff that we probably wouldn’t have uncovered with just humans alone. that makes us a better, stronger company and it makes us be able to go and do more strategic things. So, it doesn’t actually get rid of us to me. It just it makes us do cooler things than the more annoying things. We have Rip from Yellowstone here. It’s good to have you. That hat’s awesome. This is Colin. He’s one of my friends.
Thank you guys for being up there. I appreciate all your guys uh commentary over the years. I love your guys podcast. Thank you so much for sharing everything with us. But uh my question is pretty straightforward. Uh so I do some agentic trading with Robin Hood of course. Now I had to go and bolt on Claude. So I’m glad now it’s going to be all in one app. But I wanted to see your guys perspective. If you think this could be the thing that makes jobs obsolete. I my perspective is in order for AI to work. I think about it from an enterprise perspective. In order for AI to work, there has to be a reduction in employment. I I I don’t see any other way. Now, perhaps we get a productivity miracle after the fact that new industries spawn up. Uh but if you actually look at the statistics over the last 15 years, the majority of those jobs have come from healthcare, which come from government money, which comes from deficits, which makes it work. Uh so I actually think that there is going to be job destruction. That’s that’s my base case. It’ll be slower than people think but it will be there. And then we have to figure out as a society what do we do with that. Uh and that’s that’s a very difficult question. Sir when you think about systemic risks in the market um how do you think about AI just enabling faster and cheaper cyber attacks? I mean if that’s if that’s going to blow open the market where would that be and how do you just think about that risk? I’ll take a quick stab at that and I think maybe you have time for one or two more but if you look at the cyber security names Palo Alto Zcaler which is lagged but bouncing now Crowd Strike there’s a reason why those names trade at the valuation that they do and the fact that they’re name like PaloAlto is making an all-time high speaks to I think the concerns that you have and Jensen spoke about it the other day. I mean there is a real need to get your arms around that and if you’re looking just for a strict trade which I know is not sort of the intent of your question but you know I still continue to go back to those names and and you have to be somewhat um valuation agnostic because they are very expensive. Last question right here sir. So I I feel like I see all of you guys in my television every day. So is that a good thing or bad thing? No it’s good. It’s good. So, one thing I’ve noticed in in my line of work is that AI is really impacting treatment for strange difficult diseases. Companies like Tempest and Amjen and Lily are just this is the way that it things are going to change. Where do you guys see that? Because AI is really impacting medical care. I I think it’s I think the answer is yes. I think a lot I think you know it’s it’s a supercomput like it’s going to be able to you know I use it for you know some strange question that I don’t have the answer to or recently I got blood work done I put all my blood work into into you know Gemini what does this mean cuz my doctor sure’s not going to call me right and so I think tools like this are super helpful right and and so it can be helpful and scary at the same time which is okay we We all have two thoughts, you know, opposing thoughts in our brains at all time, right? And so, you know, I try to embrace what I can and I think, you know, it will be a super impactful technology on almost every industry. Can I just add briefly to that? I think one of the reasons why I’m so bullish on health care with AI is because one of the things I hate about going to the doctor is that like there’s I don’t have curious doctors. My the doctors I see are like they’re all specialists. So if you have this problem with this, you go see that specialist and they’re not thinking about the seven other things that it could be and vice versa. But AI, I think, can put together the research that comes within the specialties and connect them and actually come up with new things. It’s you’ve seen it in mathematics, too, where there’s math specialists and it connects things and unlocks solutions that haven’t been solved. And I I actually think that um or solutions to problems that haven’t been solved. So, I think that’s actually why it’s so powerful. I just eat a shitload of Cheerios. We’re out of time here, folks. Thanks so much. Enjoy the rest of your day. I’m sure you’ll see some of us floating around. Thanks, everybody.
helping us make sense of a market that is not really easy one to figure out. Uh, one more round of applause for the risk reversal crew. You know, interesting note for those guys. Uh, other than hoodies and sponsors, I believe they’re the only group to have joined us for all three hood summits. So true veterans, we love working with them. And don’t forget, you can follow them at riskreversal media on YouTube. And then for Porter, Vinnie, and Danny Moses, they have a Substack called What Are We Doing? Fantastic read. Um, so definitely check those out. And then you’ll be seeing them throughout the day. Market Call goes live at 9:45 on the pod stage. And then we’ll see Porter and Vinnie at I think noonish in the trading lab talking about trading from the short side. Now we’re going to shift to what’s happening in the markets to what you guys were just talking about AI. So how do we use the tools that we talked about last night to understand and and understand how our trading process might be changing? So as you saw in the keynote, we announced our our Robin Hood agents and agent apps. And this morning, we’re going to put them to work. Uh, and we’re going to put these tools in the hands of some experienced market professionals and the builders behind the companies that you saw as part of those app store partners. Uh, and we’re going to do some live trading workflows. So, please welcome to the stage Robin Hood’s VP of product, Abashek Fatura. He’s going to moderate a conversation with the founder of Moon Tower. Yes, Moon Tower from Days and Confused. That’s where he got the name of his company. Uh, professional options trader Chris Abdul Msia. He’ll be joined as well by Brent Kuba, the founder of Spot Gamma, and James Kardatski, the CEO of Quiver Quantitative. So, let’s go from prompt to portfolio. And let’s put our agents to work.
How are you guys doing? How’s how’s everyone doing today? Um, well, good morning and uh thanks for being up so early. Um, so who’s excited about Robin Hood agents?
How many of you uh open an account already? Okay. Uh a few less of you. Uh but uh so last night you as you guys saw we introduced Robin Hood agents and agent apps opening up Robin Hood to specialized tools and data to become part of our experience. Uh this morning we wanted to make it a little bit more real. We demoed like one thing last night, but we thought it would be cool to show it off a little bit more uh with some of the people that have made this possible. So, the goal of the session is pretty simple. We’re going to take some real market ideas. We’re going to use some real data and then we’re going to work through a couple of workflows uh that these guys have actually cooked up uh live. So in each case, we’re going to see what happens when traders start with a very simple question. Then they call on their agent with specialized tools and then they follow the information wherever it leads. And ultimately they can then decide how they want to express that view uh in the markets. So I’ve got three people here. Uh Obie already introduced them, but Chris is the founder of Moon Tower and a professional options trader. He’s also our resident trader today. Um he’s going to bring the market questions uh and challenges what the tools give him. Brent is the founder of Spot Gamma, which is one of our agent apps which specializes in options positioning, volatility, and market structure. I highly encourage you guys to check it out. I’ve been using it. It’s pretty fun. Uh Brent is going to help us understand what the options market may be telling us underneath the surface. And this is uh James, CEO of Quiver Quantitative, uh which brings together alternative data sets. I think this one’s my favorite actually. It’s the most fun. Uh from congressional and insider activity to you can see who’s lobbying, you can see who’s getting government contracts, um and a lot more. So, James is going to show us how you can use some of this information uh to look at research when you’re thinking about investing and we’ll have time to take some questions. In fact, when the agent thinks, we’ll just like open it up to questions. So, uh feel free to walk up to the mics and I’ll call on you. Uh but before we get into it, uh maybe I’ll let these three introduce themselves. Do you want to get it started, Chris? Sure. Uh my name is Chris Ablamsia. Uh I’ve been a options trader for over 20 years. I started at Susuana and worked there for almost a decade and then I ran a volatility trading strategy at a hedge fund for about a decade. Uh today I uh run an options analytics company and I talk about uh and I try to teach people about uh options trading and how to use it in uh their for whatever their investing goals are.
My name is Brent Kachuba. I’m founder of Spotgama. I started Spock Gamma in 2020. Before that, I have about 20 years of institutional trading experience at a couple of banks, uh, an options market maker, and then I was at the family office before starting Spock Gamma. And our goal is to tell you how the options flows may be moving the stocks that you and I are trading every day. James, go ahead. Uh, my name is James Kardski. I’m the CEO of Quiver Quantitative. Uh we started Quiver back in 2020 with the goal of bridging the information gap between retail investors and Wall Street. So really our purpose has always been to just find really high quality data, find ways to scrape it and then present it to retail investors in a way where they can use it to make smarter trading decisions. So yeah, really excited to bring some of our government data sets here to Robin Hood. uh looking at a lot of things like there’s kind of countless ways that government and public companies intersect whether it’s like public companies trying to influence legislation through lobbying or receiving revenue from the government through government contracts um or even members of Congress buying stock themselves with their own funds. So um we brought a lot of those data sets into Robin Hood and super excited to see what you guys are able to do with it. Cool. So Chris uh before we touch a tool, where does a trade idea actually come from? Yeah. So uh the way I think about the origin of trade ideas is um from two two two sources. So one of them is what I would just call is your senses. So you have the things that you read. You’re reading whether you’re reading a book, whether you’re reading uh Substack, whether you’re reading Twitter, uh whether you’re reading uh Robin Hood social. Um these this is uh it could be something that you’ve heard conversations that you’ve had with people. So there’s a number of ideas that are just stirring in the original LLM up here, right? The your your your gray matter and white matter. So that’s the way you move through the world is going to create inspiration and ideas. That’s one set of uh of again what I call your senses. The other place you get ideas is from the dashboards and the instrument panels that you have created that look at market data, right? And what’s happening here, I think the beauty of what they’re of what what Robin Hood’s building with these uh partners is they have created they they’ve not only shortened the bridge between these two parts of information, but they’ve widened the bridge. you are now able to have more like throughput is the way I think of it. Two-way traffic between I’ve got an idea. Let me look at the data. How do I take the ideas that I get and formulate them into a research question? How do I turn this into something that I can actually make a financial statement about in the form of a trade?
So, um today we’re going to start with two different disturbances. uh one from Washington and then one from the options market. Uh so the first example we’re going to use is we’re going to start with uh Quiver quantitative. So uh James, why don’t we ask Quiver what’s a stock where Congress is doing something unusual right now? Yeah. So one company we’ve seen recently a lot in our data is Bloom Energy. Both from Congress and from within the White House, there’s been trading within that stock. Um, so actually I’d love to, you know, show a quick demo here of like how you can actually use the Robin Hood app to find that information and then kind of walk through queries data. Um, oh yeah, perfect. Got a phone. So we have a little demo device here. We’re going to get back to Neptune from last night. So cool. So yeah, directly within Neptune here, you can just ask directly as if you were, you know, talking directly to another human, you can say, um, using quiver
which politicians have been trading Bloom recently
and then that’ll get to work starting to query the the agent, starting to query queries data to pull that from our data set. So, as part of this partnership, we’ve brought in our entire Congress trading data feed. So, basically, every single Congress trade that’s ever been reported since Congress was first required to start disclosing that back in 2014. Um, and then alongside that, we’ve also been tracking the uh presidential trading disclosures as well. So, whenever uh Trump releases new trades, we have that included within the data feed as well. So, you’ll see here that Bloom Energy, the the big headliner for the last year was uh Nancy Pelosi purchased um back in early 2026. Um, so you see here like looked through all the trades and found that Pelosi and you know gives you the trade date, gives you the amount. So in this case that’s a big position. Yeah. Yeah. One to5 million especially for Congress trading like I feel like you know you have very rich members of Congress but it’s not on like hedge fund scale typically. Um so yeah like like with this you know you can put in any stock you can do queries like what stocks have been most purchased by members of Congress recently if you want to see across everyone in Congress what’s been being bought the most. Um, but just sticking with Bloom here, like within that same theme, let’s look a little bit more into how Bloom might in turn be attempting to influence Congress. So, one thing you can do is say, um, see what issues has Bloom been lobbying on recently. And by the way, is if you guys want to follow along in your own phones, you can, uh, you can do that if you want. So our lobbying data set is also pulling from all the disclosures that have been uh reported over the last few years. So basically anytime a public company does lobbying of specific government offices, they’re required to disclose that and list off which issues and which bills they might be doing that lobbying on. So what we find is that it’s like a really really interesting data set to look at if you’re trying to figure out how companies might be affected by the government and also what their team internally is really thinking about going forward. A lot of times like in advance of new um like R&D initiatives or like in advance of like new product lines, companies might start doing some lobbying to kind of like figure out how they can shape the the legislative path to kind of be more beneficial towards them. Have you ever used uh lobbying data when you’ve traded before, Chris? Uh I didn’t because I mostly traded commodity options. Okay. Wasn’t super relevant to what I did. Yeah. So So here you can kind of see it gives a listing of like some of the recent areas where Bloom has been lobbying. They’ve been doing lobbying on energy tax credits, uh, electricity supply for data centers. Um, as you can imagine, this is a company that’s going to be really heavily affected by everything going on within the data data center space going forward. Um, and then we have another data set that lets you really dig even deeper into this this uh same vein. Um, because one of the things we track is like what legislation is actually being proposed within Congress. So every time there’s a new bill that’s being proposed at all within Congress, we scrape the details of that bill, kind of scrape a summary of it and have that included in this agent as well. So like if you even wanted to ask like what recently proposed legislation could impact Bloom.
It’ll look at all the recent bills that have been proposed on Capitol Hill and kind of, you know, parse through them to see which of them could impact a specific stock. So again, this is a really good way of like being aware about what’s going on within the political landscape, making sure if there are any risk factors you aren’t aware of in terms of like new legislation that could impact your portfolio. Um, this is a great way of staying on top of that and making sure that you’re not blindsided by anything. Um, I think this one’s really cool because when like new tax bills come out, it can like completely change uh the P&L of various companies. Yeah. Yeah. So like here for example, you can see like HR 9340, Raid Payer Protection Act, uh was placed on the Senate calendar on September 17th. Each of the bills, it’ll list off the name of the bill, list off the current status of them. So you can see like whether they’re uh currently in committee or whether they’re just proposed or whether they’re being brought to a vote. Uh it tells you a little summary of like what the the bill is proposing. So here, for example, large data centers would pay the incremental cost of a new generation and grid upgrade grids needed to serve them. And then it can also tell you why this matters to the company in question. So again, if you didn’t have this tool available, you would have to spend probably hours and hours pouring over these bills. Like they’re not easy to read. They’re like legal ease. They’re often like very long and very complicated. Uh this just gives you a really quick distillation of like why it’s important and what you can do with it. So um yeah, we think this is a great new way just like for everyday people to stay on top of this data. And also um you know in the past I think this is the sort of thing that only hedge funds would have really had the time and resource to to pour into this data whereas now it’s kind of available to anybody. I think we have a question why don’t we take a question in between but uh thank you for wonderful um presentation. So um I opened the MCP account a while ago and uh connected my own agent but um you know it’s not really giving me option to do what you guys are doing right now. Um when will that be resolved? So this is the new Robin Hood agents that we should have rolled out to all of you last night here. So if you find me afterwards I can help you get set up. H because this is not available in whatever agent you’re using probably. Yeah. So I just connected and I was trying to find a way to get to where you are and I would love to you know follow along on all this uh wonderful journey and uh you know I’m kind of finding myself at odds. Yeah. Yeah. Why don’t you find me afterwards and we’ll get you set up. Um, so Chris, yeah, just because a politician bought it, does that mean uh we should buy it? Well, so first of all, it it’s uh when it comes to data, what one of the things we’re looking for are what we kind of call disturbances. What’s an anomaly? Buying is always a bit more interesting than selling when you’re looking at insider transactions. The reason, of course, is because uh insiders sell stock all the time. On a 10 uh 105D1, they’re on a regular uh selling schedule. They’re just raising liquidity. So, the chance that selling has any signal in it is a lot harder to know because it is such a regular event. But buying is a lot more of an interesting signal because you’re thinking about you have an executive who is already it could be well in this case it’s Pelosi but if you have an executive that’s buying they’re already long that uh asset right so they’re really adding quite a lot of concentration to what they’re doing so you want to pay attention to that a bit more but I would like to see uh a little bit more uh information to think about bloom energy in this
turn to Brent here. So, uh, Brent, we have Bloom on our radar now. Now, so why don’t we figure out what the options market says about it? Yeah. And I think as I, uh, have the opportunity to walk you through how you can actually add our app to the agent here. Hopefully, I do this right. Uh, we notice here we go into the marketplace and we scroll down to the options edge, which is our, uh, our offering here. And any of you that do this now, you get this free for a month. So you can add on and try this out for free. And the nice thing about this as we load it up is that the options market and prices in the options market or the volatility surface as someone like Chris might say gives us a lot of interesting information about the expectation of the price distribution of stock. So are people still bullish on Bloom? Will you see that reflected in call prices uh or put prices? And so that gives us an extra opportunity to see, hey, Nancy Pelosi bought it. what does everyone else think about this thing? And so in this case, what we can do is we can say using spot gamma. I should spell spot gamma correctly. It would help. Uh it’s your company.
So I can ask about the IV rank and skew rank. Now the IV rank is going to tell us how expensive options are on a relative basis. This is for one month options. And what skew rank tells us is what is the price of calls versus puts. And Chris can kind of tie in why this might be interesting for us. Now, uh, but I think about the prices that we’re going to get returned here is important because as an retail options trader myself, uh, I’m looking for disturbances as well as a primary signal for what I want for what I want to trade. So, are options cheap? Are they rich? Um, and what kind of structures can I set up around this? And I found that this app has been incredible to help me use that kind of top offunnel idea for what highle prices are and then drill down into the trades that I want to make. And so Chris, as you can see here, the IV rank is an eight. Uh this is based on a one year of data. So this is telling me that the options prices now are cheaper than they’ve been basically than 90% of the last year. And the skew rank is 93. So that tells me that calls for one-month options are more expensive than puts, more expensive than been 90% over the last year essentially. And so a lot of people like the Pelosi position here of leaning long into this stock. Yeah. So this is this data is interesting because um if you have a bullish view let’s say you want to take the view of the insiders that are buying you have a bullish view. Now one thing is part of this view is likely baked into the stock price already. Bloom energyy’s tripled this year. So it’s not exactly new information that that there was this insider buying. But now we look at the option surface and we can consider well if I have a bullish posture if I have a momentum sort of view on this stock then what I can do here is I can structure what I can I like to look at the option surface to say let me take what it gives me. What the market here is giving me is it’s saying option premiums are relatively low right now. The IV rank is under 10%. So where less than 10% of the time balls get this cheap. The other thing that’s happening is the call skew is very elevated. With this the combination of these two forces, what it will do is it will reduce straddle prices relatively, but it will raise call prices relative to the straddle price. What is that doing? It is creating a very cheap vertical spread. Like if you buy an at the money option like a 50 delta option and you sell a 25 delta call, you are sort of exploiting the way the curve looks in the options market. So you’re buying the thing that’s relatively cheap and selling the thing that’s relatively expensive and you’re doing it in a directional to sort of um take the posture of of momentum. Now an interesting thing about Bloom is and when I uh had looked this up, it’s also a very expensive stock. So, uh, being a very expensive stock, it’s I think it says a three, uh, like a PE of like over three 300, um, and we know that there’s been buying. So, there’s another there’s other questions here is like, um, that you’re going to be able to research. For example, when insiders buy, how long do they typically hold for? Because when I think of Bloom, I’m sort of torn between is this a short-term trade that I want to go into or what do I think about this long term? I always think back to I I I I teach investing class to some kids and I use uh Zoom stock as a case study. Zoom stock was 300 PE kind of like Bloom is today five uh five six years ago like during COVID. And what happened with Zoom was that the price the anticipation of great earnings like we have in Bloom was correct. Zoom stock has multiplied um you know 4x 5x its profits in the last 5 years but you’ve lost 70% of the value of your investment in the last 5 years because of course the wrong price will ruin any investment. So what’s happening here is you have these questions that you can ask. How long do these people tend to hold their positions? So maybe I want to be bullish because uh there’s maybe if I find out I do research with with a quiver and say, “Oh, they typically hold their positions for 3 years or longer.” Uh then maybe we’re still early. But if they tend to trade their position a bit more, then maybe I actually want to have a bearish posture. So uh and the options market will tell you what you can do to execute the trade. And here what it’s saying is balls are cheap, calls are expensive. Maybe I can uh I’ll buy I can buy I can buy the at the monies sell the 25 delta to be long or if I’m long already I can buy uh protection because my puts are relatively cheap. I can buy 10% out of the money put relatively cheap and I can coller it by selling a call.
That’s right. And we can do some other queries here to pull up key levels and things like that around Bloom as well to see where the biggest positions are in terms of the biggest call strikes, uh, where the most gamma is and different queries like that. And so this tool does a great job of letting you filter down through finding the key names on something like Quiver Quant and then dialing in and getting more granular on that type of data. Now, one of the other data sets we want to show uh were the biggest options position changes. And and to me, this is one of the best aspects of our data set because a lot of times you hear on CNBC or on Twitter, hey, somebody just bought 50,000 of these calls. And the truth is you don’t know who somebody is. That could be a market maker to a market maker. It could be less uh offering less information than you think. And so what we do here is we can say, “Show me where the biggest position changes are.” And we’re showing you what we believe the buy side is doing. The buy side is hedge funds and or large retail traders. And that to me can offer more information in terms of prices. So I can say uh show me the biggest options position changes for Intel. We had to prepare for this uh so we’re using some data from Monday uh cuz these were very interesting options position. I believe that was the 28th 26th. Um, and so what we’re going to get here, we should get here is a list of the biggest buy side options position changes. What options did they buy and sell? Because as we all know, not all calls are purchased long and not all calls are uh or puts are bought long, right? Or you can buy and sell options. And so what’s going to come up here is a list of the biggest options trades for Intel um on the 28th. Now, you can ask for today as well if you’d like. And you can also do a bunch of interesting things like show me the biggest options positions in the semiconductor space or in the energy space. uh or say, “Hey, what are the congressmen trading? What options positions do they happen to open?” And so, we highlighted this because it’s a really fascinating uh discussion topic here. The two biggest trades from the 28th are just these monster positions, $14 million of premium each. And what this trader appears to do is they sold the April 2027 105 puts, and they use those funds to purchase the October 16th 130 calls. So we would call this a diagonal uh something like a combo diagonal Chris I guess you call that. Um and so this gives us a really interesting position because as Intel stock was coming off somebody stepped up selling longerdated puts to buy shorterd dated calls clearly they’re looking for some type of a rally in this situation. So you were saying that once you use this is like interesting because in the previous example we looked at the government data first and then we started looking at the options data. In this example, we’re starting with the options data first and then you were saying we can then track it down to the politicians data. Do you think it would be cool then to bridge this with what is like what are politicians doing with with uh semiconductors? Yeah. Uh that’s one of the things that I found to be most fascinating about the app is that it understands the prices and say so one of the things I was able to do for example is show me options pos uh show me options that have a high IV rank and are near the 52- week high because the agent understands what a 52- week high is and then it can pull for example the stocks that also have a high IV rank. So a stock up ballup situation oftentimes can create rich premium for example. Um so we could do something like that. uh here. Now, Chris, back to the uh Intel example. Um when you see a large buyside trade like that, does that generally queue you off to I mean, there’s 13,000 hedge funds in the world and they often times have unlimited resources, right? So, their large trades I think often times can create the distribution or disturbances we were referencing. Yeah, absolutely. So this one was uh kind of looked at Intel because I had seen something online talking about large call buying uh in Intel and that was what uh made me want to think hey let’s let’s look let’s look this up in uh spot gamma and then we saw those um those calls. Now the interesting thing is uh if you look back those yeah they’re ox 16. So the interesting thing is this is a big bet on Ox 16 calls and they were opening. Now Ox 16th is before Intel’s earnings. Intel’s earnings are on October 23rd. So somebody is buying these calls but it’s ahead of earnings. It’s a little I thought that was a little bit strange like why would you you’re placing this big bet but it’s before earnings. But what’s happening tonight? We have micron earnings today. So is somebody doing the sympathy trade in Intel and buying the calls there capturing micron earnings? So you can be a little maybe the seller of those calls is a little offguard because they’re like whatever these are these are not capturing earnings. They don’t deserve at the premium but Micron um but Micron is today. So it’s to me this potentially somebody making that kind of bet. Now I would like to know are micron earnings expected to be important? So Brent can can we look up what micron earnings are going to be like? Yeah, absolutely. I’m going to punch that up. Uh the query I brought here combines the quiver quant data and stock gamma data here in this case and I searched for stocks that have an IV rank above 50 and has recent congressional buying and turns out that Apple I guess they’re very excited about the flip phone with the Robin Hood app. And so here you go. We got uh Apple Ivy Rank and looks like Ed Casease here uh bought some of that stock and so you’re seeing again the combination of the options data and uh the quiver quant data set which is just uh really I mean Chris what would you do as a next step to this? So you know that IV rank on Apple is high and there’s been some recent congressional activity like how would you think about that? This sorry this isn’t this is an Apple. Oh, this this happens to be an Apple this example because it combines the quiver quant data with the options data. So, if we take the Intel example, well, I would like to can we can we look at what what’s going on in Micron because it’s kind of my my thinking is related to to the to the Micron just because I think that expiration choice is a bit strange for Intel. Like it’s a pretty shortdated bet. It’s a lot of premium.
So, we’ll look at the Intel first.
It doesn’t like the word Ivy. It’s my nervous fingers here. I don’t know. I think uh Ivy just keeps getting uh autocorrected to uh in Why don’t we take another question while uh while you type? There we go. Do you want to take a question? Yeah. Thank you. um particularly on agentic trading for legend. Is this going to be available in terms of the data feeds you’re talking about? And I got a followup to that if uh we can get a direct answer to the first one. Um I think long-term yes not not immediately. No. Um love the MCP availability. Can we get an API? Because for the majority of people that are doing anything algorithmic or with locally hosted AI or anything that’s a stack of agents, I want an API. And anybody on Interactive or on Trade Station or on any of the competitors, they will move to Robin Hood if you give them an API. And I’ I’ve been scratching my head on how to do that with the MCP, but you’re wrapping something that’s not designed to do the same thing. Yeah, we’ve been looking into it. So, okay. Thank you.
Are you ready or it’s still going? It’s still going. It’s getting All right, let’s take one more. Hey, thanks for like arranging this session. I just had a question about like uh congressional buying because mostly like the disclosures come like weeks or months after the actual trade has taken place. So, how do you think like AI can help us like bridge this gap? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, within our data set, we publish both when the trade was made and then when it was published. Uh, you’re spot on that there’s often like a gap of several weeks between when politicians make the trade and when they actually report it. Uh, in some cases more than several weeks, some of them wait years before they report old trades. Um, but uh, yeah, so we we have that data all included within this data set. So, you can see when it was made, when it was reported. Uh, one of the things we find is that often, you know, these politicians, while they may have access to inside information, they might not necessarily be day traders. So even if they make a trade like several weeks ago, it might be based on more of like a long-term thesis that they have about how different things within, you know, the the government or within the geopolitical space is going to be impacting company. So a lot of times like in the research we’ve done, we see there’s still a lot of uh you know important insights that can be gained from tracking it even though there’s this gap between when a trade is made and when it’s disclosed. I think unfortunately we’re probably going to need a law change to bring that time down.
You guys ready? Yeah. So, as you can see here, back to that Intel trade we were just discussing. Um, you can see here that the IV rank is a 46 and the skew rank is a 63. So, that upside called distribution or that call skew is a lot less than in bloom, but the overall implied V is quite a bit higher as the stock has been moving quite a bit. It’s been mentioned by Trump and a lot of the other politicians quite a bit uh recently as well. So that that volatility is much higher or that implied volatility is much higher which tells me that the options are more expensive. So as an options trader, I want to think about spread trading or ways to potentially offset some of that richer IV. Uh which again is part of your idea funnel uh and trade idea generation. This helps me to put this thing into context. Yeah, this is going back to the possibility that it’s a a micron sympathy trade. If uh if micron earnings are priced relatively low, meaning that the straddle, meaning that it’s not expected to move very much, this actually sets up an interesting possibility that the person that’s betting on uh on Intel here, maybe you actually want to be a seller of these calls or a seller of the volatility because if Micron’s own earnings straddle doesn’t expect Micron to move very much, then the sympathy trade loses a lot of its appeal. So if we know that the options here are elevated, the call skew is a little bit elevated and the thesis for the trade is kind of broken, if micron’s not supposed to move very much, then there’s this opportunity to possibly sell either sell straddles in Intel or sell covered call. If you’re a long if you’re an Intel holder, you could sell a call against it. But one thing I want to also um just remind you is that um if somebody comes in and they buy like the let’s say Intel’s 120 and somebody buys the 130 call it affects the whole V surface. It causes the vault in that um in those in that expiry to to rise which means that you don’t have to go and sell the 130 call. You can sell elevated vault on a different strike. So if you sell the straddle, you are still sort of taking the other side is how I think of it of this buyer. You’re just not doing it in the same strike. But all the all the strikes are deeply related when they’re fairly close to each other. So if you see buying in the 130 call, you don’t have to anchor too much to I need to be out there selling the 130 call to take the other side of this. I can just sell the straddle or I can pick the structure that suits what you want your portfolio to look like. Cool. I mean, James, uh, should we ask Quiver about what it’s been learning about Intel and what Washington has to say about Intel? Yeah, definitely. Yeah. So, I guess we’ve already kind of given some examples here of uh, congressional purchases in Intel’s an interesting one because there has been a lot of congressional trading in the stock. So, one of the things that we can do here is like uh, instead of listing trade by trade, actually do some aggregations. So you can ask um has Congress been doing more purchasing or more selling? Your typing is much more impressive than mine by the way. Get the texting hands here, I guess. Um in 20 while uh this thing cooks. You want to go ahead? Oh, I’m so sorry. Oh my gosh. So my name is Colin. Thank you guys so much. Um so I love you guys. Agentic Trading. I opened an agentic account as soon as you guys rolled it out. But my question is, it looks like there’s only one agent. Um, I built probably about a half dozen on Claude and I have a Grockbot scanner that goes overnight. Will it be able to feed this agent and then have this agent execute trades? Um, so our our plan is to have a couple of different things. We’re going to leave the external accounts and MCP open. so that if you want to continue to use that, you can continue to use that with this. This is all going to be inside the Robin Hood ecosystem. And the plan is for you to be able to have multiple of these as well inside of the Robin Hood app. So, you should be at first you’ll just be able to have uh one per account, but over time we want to be able to do more. Thank you. I was just getting like like scared that I was going to have to try to have 12 agents shoved into one dude in the app and he was just going to take a thousand years to make an actual trade. I don’t know. And you can keep doing what you’re doing, too. That’s awesome. That’s what I was afraid of cuz I mean it took me a long time to get it working and then co-work felt like not doing it anymore. So, I had to like learn how to code. I’m a hair stylist. I don’t know how to do any of this. So, I use my microphone. I’ve never used a keyboard because obviously I talk well, but I can’t type to save my life. So, as long as I can keep using that, I’m really excited for this. Thank you for bringing it forward. Cool. So, yeah, turning back to uh Intel here, you can see that the agents successfully pulled the trades that have happened so far in 2026. Uh I did a quick summary here showing that there’s been nine separate purchases for $4 million and 10 sales for an estimated $250,000. Um, so yeah, queries like this are very easy for the agent. Um, I really liked some of the queries you guys were showing earlier that kind of combined in data from multiple agents or multiple different data sources. I think that that’s definitely like one of the coolest things I found in my own testing of this is just how easy it is to bring in a lot of very diverse data sets and come up with like really interesting unique investment thesises based off of that. Um, I think in general, like, you know, anytime you combine uh unique sources of information, it often gives you insights that maybe other people aren’t clued in on yet, which I think often gives you, uh, you know, very investable insights. So, um, yeah, I definitely would highly recommend trying to use some of these data sets in combination with one another to try to find a unique angle that other people may not have really considered yet. Um, so we only have four minutes left. I guess before we open it up to the rest of the questions, I wanted to ask each of you guys. So this thing lets you combine all these external data sources that might have signal. What would be the dream data source that you want in this thing to be able to to analyze the dream data source? Um well stock trading is relatively new to me compared to commodity trading. So, on the stock trading side, I would really just want to dig into uh I’ve had a lot of questions for James because the congressional stuff and the insider trading stuff is all interesting. And what I would want to know, for example, we just pulled up the Intel data set and I would like to know, well, what is considered uh significant? Because I see these buys and I see these sells, but I don’t really have a frame of reference or or sense of proportion around what is a large quantity. what is a disturbance in buying and selling? What’s abnormal? So for me, I would probably just for now be diving into what quiver has to offer because uh I think the combination of that plus uh like some options data like spot gamma and my knowledge of options, the combination together is what would be compelling to me. How about you? I I’m excited not necessarily for having more data, but it’s the synthes synthesis of the data that is being offered here that really to me is helpful because I have the workflows that I like and I spend a lot of time filtering through the data myself, you know, looking at the options chains myself, trying to find IB ranks and and just something to trigger a trade idea like a congressional trade, right? And so it’s the ability to kind of combine all this and very just quickly give me the answer that I want. Uh that is really exciting for me. So, so that that sort of again synthesize that data and just give me what I want is uh is is something that’s very exciting here. How about you? Yeah, I mean I definitely say like just within the world of alternative data, there’s like so many unique things that you can touch on that you wouldn’t necessarily think have like a impact on the stock market, but if you really dig deep into it, you can find ways that you can kind of figure out what might be happening in the future with a company based on the data. though. Um, if I’m playing fair here and not like saying something that we’re already bringing or that CR already has, I feel like, uh, data on like satellite imagery is like one of the examples I always look at where it’s like there’s really really cool things that you can do with that data to see like how things are happening in the commodity space. Uh, you know, even like looking at like parking lots to see like how many cars are going in and out of different like companies like retail locations. So, um, yeah, we don’t provide that ourselves, but that’s, you know, the sort of thing that I think is really cool that retail investors might one day have access to. We actually do have a satellite data provider in the agent apps that are going to be there. Uh it’s called Skyfi and I’ve been talking to those guys about giving each of you guys the ability to deploy your own satellite uh wherever you want. So maybe one day. Um all right, we’ll wrap it up with a few more questions. Do you want to go ahead? Yeah, thank you. Um, I’m just curious after seeing like real usage on the platform, what are users doing that’s surprising to you or um made you rethink the product in some way? Yeah. Uh, I mean, you know, it’s been a little bit hard so far because when people are using MCPs and connecting outside agents, we actually don’t see what you’re doing aside from your trades. So, it’s actually difficult. we don’t see like what you’re talking a claude about so or codeex about. So we’ve only heard stories. I I think the coolest ones I I’ve I’ve seen personally and are sort of the origin story for some of what we’ve built is some people we saw were getting these like Mac minis. They were running agent longunning agents on their Mac minis. Then they were like buying a bunch of data sources, providing credentials, connecting their Robin Hood account, then connecting like Telegram to it. And they were basically just talking to their Robin Hood account and bridging together like five different data sources. And then we like asked ourselves, what if we could do that in like six clicks in the app? And that’s basically how we got to Robin Hood agents. So um yeah, thank you.
Cool. We’ll take one more and then we’ll wrap it. Hey Bishek, my name is Samir. Thank you for giving power to the retail investors by building the tools that give access uh to do so many things on Robin Hood app. Uh the demo that we got to see today is cool but I wanted to to know what is our strategy to take it to the next level wherein finding information is good but automating it to place trades automatically like copy trading when it is coming to Robin Hood. I mean you can do that like each of these examples we showed here you could set it up so I mean we haven’t rolled out loops yet so that once we have loops so we showed that last night but I think the example where he showed uh like look for stocks with an IV rank of over 50 and uh recent congressional activity you’ll be able to set up a loop which just says like run this every day and if it’s true do these things and it’ll just it can just trade for you. Um, so we just didn’t show that right now, but uh it should let you do that. Yeah, you could you could take it directly from the chat and say, “Let’s go trade this.” And it it’s a very smooth transition. That’d be great. Wonderful. Thank you. Yeah, of course. Cool. Well, thank you guys. Hopefully you enjoy the product. Please give lots of feedback. Um, and if you can’t uh figure out how to access it, go to that like dome looking thing in the middle of the booth and they’ll help you out. Cool. Thanks so much. All right.
the new Asian apps. With that, everyone, we’ve earned our first break of the day. Go grab some coffee. If someone wants to get me one, that’d be great. Check out the booth. We’ll see you back here at 10:00 a.m. sharp for ETF State of the Union with Guyadami and State Streets Matt Bartellini. And everyone watching on YouTube, don’t go far. Live stream stays live. We’ll see you in 10 minutes.
All right, welcome back. That was quick, but we are back. Before we get started, quick check on the markets. Looks like markets are green today. S&P’s up 40 points, NASDAQ up 232, Dow up 7 points, small caps up about a third of a percent. Uh, VIX hanging out around 15. So, not like we’re really missing too much today. Uh nothing like hosting a conference where half the audience could be looking at their phones and that’s technically being engaged. So um all right well we are shifting gears now and we are talking ETFs. How many people out here trade ETFs use ETFs? I’m sure everyone right we all do. Uh well this market has evolved tremendously from what it started as the sort of traditional index funds uh from many decades ago and and our next conversation really focuses on that where the ETF market is today where the innovation is happening how these products are creating new ways to think about income exposure portfolio construction. So to help us understand that, we’re going to bring back a guy we just saw, uh, Guy Adami, and he’ll be joined by the managing director and global head of research strategist at State Street Investment Management, Matthew Bartellini. This is the ETF State of the Union, sponsored by State Street.
Not too difficult to get people smarter than I am, but clearly I have one in Matt. Matt, welcome aboard. How are you? Good. How are you? We’re going to talk ETFs and you know, Fast Money, we spent a lot of time obviously talking about ETFs, so we’ll break this down into sort of three segments and the pro proliferation. Number one, by the way, again, questions. We have mics set up. So, you know, in about 20 minutes or so, if you want to make your way to the mics if you have questions, but let’s talk about ETFs. And we’re here sort of on a historic day. I think globally the 14,000 ETFs now, 5,000 in the United States. I mean, just think about the magnitude of that. But talk about inflows and we were talking about it earlier before we came on. Something pretty significant is taking place right now. Yeah. So, it’s oddly enough today while we’re talking about the ETF State of the Union is the fact that as of today in 2026, ETFs in the US have now taken in 1.53 trillion for the year. And that actually breaks the fullear record from last year of 1.52 trillion. And we’re only 9 months into the year. And we’ve been putting out projections all year that we would hit 2.3 trillion here just in the US. And we think that we’re going to be definitely in that realm because we are on that trajectory where we’re at 1.53 trillion just through 9 months and only, you know, in the fourth quarter we typically do see a seasonal bump. It’s a staggering number. So the the obvious question is 14,000 ETFs globally, 5,000 United States. How do you rise above? Like how do you become the go-to ETFs? Like h how do you differentiate yourself? Yeah. I mean from our lineup, we always try to build different strategies with specific solutions in mind and specific outcomes in mind. And I think for this audience, when you’re trying to screen through all those 14,000 globally, 5,000 in the US, I would think about it from that lens, too. Like, what outcome am I trying to solve for? Because ETFs have definitely shifted from just pure access vehicles and are now definitive outcome vehicles. If you want to target a specific outcome in your portfolio for income or risk management or even again on the access side targeting some sort of thematic sector and you need to screen through 5,000 different ETFs, start with that outcome first. You know, if you’re looking for, you know, the Federal Reserve is raising rates and you want to manage your duration profile and you want to have something that can mitigate the impact on rising rates and sit maybe on the shorter end of the curve. Well, you could you’re really looking for a broad macro beta exposure. So looking in that term structure and then maybe prioritizing on fees because there’s not a lot of differentiation between one to threeyear government bonds from one issuer from another to another. You’re getting that macro exposure. But then maybe if you’re looking at income, you want to maybe sort on yield first on that outcome and then look on the sustainability. So there’s different criteria for different different areas and different outcomes. So for us when we’re trying to build solutions we’re building for different outcomes and I think for investors try to dissect the ETF industry by your outcome driven nature first. Talk about pro you know we in my prior conversation we talked about process and I think I’m always sort of drawn to that because I’m fascinated is how do people get to certain places again with 14,000 ETFs globally. You’d say to yourself we’ve we’ve attacked every possible angle but clearly that’s not the case. So the process of and you brought some sort of slides to illustrate this. Yeah. So from a process perspective, it all it does start with what are we trying to achieve? What solution are we trying to deliver? And we always try to deliver specific solutions to an end investor’s client concerns. Now one of the interesting things that has happened over the last few years, you’ve seen regulation unlock a good period of innovation in terms of different SEC rules. Whether it’s these are the 6C11 and 18F4. It’s basically the allowance of of of creating more active funds and more active funds or even index ones with derivatives. So the chart here showcases this. We’ve seen significantly more active funds and active funds utilizing derivatives. So now we have more tools at our disposal to create differentiated strategies. So one that we’ve done in the last two years is is bringing a hedge fund strategy into an ETF structure. And it really allowed us to do this because of those regul regulation changes where we can now use bits of leverage of uncorrelated assets. Previously you only had a 2x leverage cap. Now you have a VAR test that actually allows you to create more leverage within an underlying portfolio utilizing prudent measures of capital efficiency combining equities bonds and commodities together and harnessing the sort of coariance matrix and correlation and getting something about 180 200% gross notional leverage. So our process really starts of what are we trying to achieve? What are our tools at our disposal that can achieve that? And with this regulation changes, we’d have more tools at our disposal, but it does increase a lot of the complexity in the overall ETF industry. How do you determine success? Is it as simple as inflows and usage? Because again, I don’t know the numbers you do, but it would appear to me that there are BETFs that are going to fail for a var, you know, myriad of different reasons. So, success. Yeah. So, last year in 2025, there was a thousand ETFs launched. We’re already at a thousand now in 2026 and we’re likely to outpace that. And what success looks like, I mean, from an issuers’s perspective, you would obviously say a successful ETF is a large one that generates a lot of revenue. And commercially, that is 100% correct. But another level of success is does it appeal to a lot a lot of broad swath of investors? Are there more organic investors utilizing it? Can it appeal to an individual investor, a wealth adviser, institutional investor? And for me that is a greater measure of success when you look at a 13F profile and you see more clients in it because that means that one fund is hitting on a outcome or a need and we’ve been able to deliver a successful solution that has more durability and consistency but applicability beyond just say one or two key clients. although two key clients that’s great that it works for them but having something that is really democratized across a lot of different investors to meet their needs I think is extremely successful from my lens what is the correlation between complexity and usage if that makes sense so I there’s a low correlation I think in some sense there’s a a high correlation between complexity and launches more launches recently have anchored into the more complex utilizing derivatives and utilizing different forms of leverage and more esoteric type of strategies where you have derivatives on top of derivatives. I think the correlation between complexity and success though is low because still we see a lot of usage in your core essential building block exposures. So lowcost core exposures general active exposures as well. I will say though when you combine complexity with a specific portfolio outcome. So derivative income ETFs are been driving growth in the active landscape and I talked about this yesterday on a podcast. They are complex. You’re utilizing options to create a specific income stream. It’s much different than just buying high dividend yielding equities. And so there is a level of complexity because there’s also different tax rules associated with it. in there that is a high correlation between actually delivering on a key portfolio outcome and having success. The other one would be within defined outcome ETFs. Those are quite complex. are utilizing different tranches of equity options, but you’ve actually created a more novel risk management tool. And I think it’s really eaten the lunch of your traditional low volatility equity exposures or your minimum volatility factor exposures as well because those proved to not be that helpful during uh systematic draw downs like we had during COVID and during 2022 where they had still embody that native risk of equities and they drew down significantly. Well, defined outcome ETFs are offering a complex vehicle utilizing options. And sometimes in the wealth space, you have to take a suitability test to actually utilize them. And so there is some level of complexity, but they’ve been massively successful. And I think the runway for those is is pretty pretty far. As I mentioned, if we make it to January, fast money is 20 years old, which is remarkable. And for a long period of time, fixed income was not something we talked about. There was really no reason to talk about it. the last year obviously that’s changed there seems to be this proliferation of fixed income ETFs so can you speak about sort of the growth there yeah so it’s really interesting fixed income ETFs if you look at it from a a markets perspective and you see you know in the ETF space you do see a lot of return chasing and trend following which is is valid and and a and a great use of ETFs to sort of position where you think the market is going if you look at bonds bonds as an asset class they’re kind of in a lost decade right Now bonds are in a lost decade where you’ve had significantly negative returns or returns below the rate of cash and you should as a asset be returning above cash because you’re departing with that liquidity of cash. So even though the bond market has been challenged from a return space, fixed income ETFs continue to just break records every single year. They’ve already broken fullear records so far this year with over 450 billion of inflows. And if you look at from a market share perspective, they’re taking more market share of what their uh AUM would indicate from a flow perspective. So they’re gaining market share relative to equities. And you continuously see greater adoption and usage. It’s not just these lowcost vehicles. You see actively managed fixed income exposures growing in the number of launches, in the number that are actually producing strong results in terms of excess return or excess yield, but also in terms of flows. So fixed income ETFs are a growth engine for ETF usage and assets for the next 10, 15, 20 years. And you’re seeing it in light of outflows within the mutual fund space. So ETFs are becoming the deacto default option to put into portfolios whether it’s in equities, fixed income or alternatives as well. And I think you’ll continue to see more flows into the fixed income ETF market which speaks to innovation and complexity trends. We have a chart here but speak to that because innovation like any in any other industry innovation is critical and and you continue to innovate. Yeah. So one of the charts here this is something I’ we’ve been talking a lot about. There’s a QR code here that links to the research that we have done as well around the need for income and it’s it’s a it’s a pure essential portfolio outcome. It there’s three of them. It’s capital appreciation, income and risk management. And the income potential from traditional assets is at all-time lows. So the ETF that we launched in 1993 is a good example of this. It’s S&P 500. Its dividend yield went below 1% for the first time this past year because the index itself went to about 1.05% in an all-time low. And so how do you actually get income in this type of market environment? In one way is through innovation. Those derivative income exposures utilizing options because of the way regulation has allowed for a greater use of derivatives has unlocked this potential to create a differentiated return stream that can actually seek higher levels of income and you can do it in many different ways. You can do it on broad markets. You can do it on sectors as you can see out out there at our booth. You can do it across single stocks as well. And you have all these things at your disposal now to create really differentiated return streams and income streams because as I walked through yesterday on that podcast, their reaction function to market environments is very different than the reaction function of high dividend yielding equities because if the market draws down, well, those companies will if their profits go down, they’ll probably cut their dividend. And now you have less of an income stream in fixed income. If yields rise, you’re not actually getting that yield right away. it’s just a yield out on offer. You have to continuously reinvest it and the income stream will have a longer latency to catch up to it. With a derivative income, if the if the market falls and volatility rises, you have a quicker reaction to harness that volatility premium because you’re consistently selling it. So, I think innovation has helped unlock new use cases for ETFs that were probably just within more separately managed accounts or or towards institutional investors. alternative invest there conferences that I go to about alternative investments which 10 years ago was not something we were probably talking about but obviously again on that curve of growth you have to be on top of what’s going on in the alt space so speak to that I think it’s essential so portfolio diversification is is really being challenged by those the historical norms that bonds are your only true diversifier to equities I think it would probably be you know fascinated everyone in the audience here that in 13 of the last equity draw downs, bonds actually fell in nine of them, too. They’re not really a reliable source or only the reliable source of diversification. And this is something we continuously talk about from a markets perspective. In my seat, we talk about this new macro environment of more fragmentation where inflation has become a more durable risk driver. And if we look at the reaction function of equities and fixed income together, equities, they don’t really like rising inflation. bonds, nominal bonds don’t really like rising inflation. And so if you have a period where inflation is a more durable risk driver or something that we have had not to deal with for really a long time in the era of the 2010s, basically inflation was about 1.2%. Now we’re at more durably around 3% and that’s something new. So having these discussion about alternatives, you don’t have to get too crazy, you know, in the alt space to pick up some form of diversification. You don’t have to buy equity long, short, market neutral, relative value arbitrage, more complex sophisticated strategies. Add in some commodities, real assets, gold, inflation linked bonds, other things that will have a different macro relationship. And I think from a flow perspective, we have seen that because we can see these flows on a daily basis in these more tactical thematic spaces. And we do see inflation link bonds, they’ve had inflows in 199 last 20 months. Broad-based commodity ETFs are at records. Gold flows were records last year and they’ve rebounded this year. And we see all of these flows going into something to build more reliable, durable diversification. And from a category perspective, those more, I would say, true alternatives, the esoteric alternatives, the ones that do fit in that fit in that melting pot, they are at record inflows as well because investors are realizing that bonds are not the only diversifier to your equity book. And it’s because of the way they have different re macro relationships that really haven’t been tested, you know, up until now. In 2008 and09, leverage became sort of this four-letter word. Maybe for good reasons. I’m not going to sort of debate that, but levered ETFs are obviously a thing. So, let’s drill down a little bit there because I’m sure there’s some mixed feelings about that. So, there are. I mean, one of the interesting things is I read an article from a while ago that said leverage is one of the true last market arbitragees. And it’s not the leverage in the sense of going 2x a single stock every day and then having to deal with the the volatility drag of that. I think there’s some concerns there that you’re not getting 2x the return of something over a one-year time horizon. It’s on a single day and there can be volatility drag and you’re actually be actually underperform as a result of that. but prudent use of leverage, capital efficiency, the ability to have to take a part of your portfolio and stack different macro factors upon each other. That’s what that 18F4 rule from the SEC helped unlock. That is one of the I think the true last arbitragees out in the marketplace. the ability to combine prudently uncorrelated return streams so your portfolio is not so directionally associated with what goes on in the S&P 500 or what happens from an interest rate perspective. I think that in the prudent use of it of capital efficiency of blending two assets together with low correlations to each other to create more durable and resilient portfolios. I think that is something where ETFs are going to continue to grow into and we’ve made inroads in the last say 18 months of thinking through and trying to solve that problem of what assets where do you use leverage how do you use it and the big one that no one really ever understands or not understands but ever talks about is what’s the outcome in the taxable investor space because if you utilize all this leverage and use swaps futures options contracts get all this leverage but at the end of the day you saddle the end investor with a large capital gain That is a poor investor experience. So we think very diligently of when we’re carefully constructing portfolios and utilizing derivatives and leverage, what is the worst possible outcome that could happen for that taxable investor. How do you view lever ETFs as trading vehicles? Like how should somebody like me think about it and how should the people in audience think about them? It’s just sort of an arrow in their quiver. Yeah. So I mean within our suite we don’t really have any pure levered ETFs that take you know the 2x 3x uh mechanism but what I’ll say is they should be used as intended as trading vehicles to take a directional market view to give you an extra oomph or extra volatility for that directional bet. And I would say leverage ETFs they were making headlines because the headlines said that AUM hit an all-time high. And while that was true, it was really wasn’t driven by a massive amount of inflows. They actually levered ETFs that had basically middling amount of inflows. It was because of the directionality of the leverage. It was on semiconductors on single single stock semis. It was on the AI related ecosystem and that exploded as we all know. And so in that case, if you had that directional view that you think that AI was going to just have this sort of J curve boom to it and you are looking at the range of solutions out there to invest in it, you have different levels of volatility in which you could do it. You could do it in sort of a traditional semiconductor ETF or if you’re willing to sort of take on that levered bet, do it that way. It’s not for a long-term investment, I think, is the big punchline of of my answer though. Tactical trends. I mean obviously again that that goes speaks to innovation but you have to sort of see where the world is going and I think you do an extraordinary job of that. We have a chart but speak to some of the what are you seeing the tactical trends. So one of the things that happened this year was the awakening of sector investing. So if we look at uh sector flows here on the chart they kind of have been middling around for a little bit have been in outflows for some years but this year you’re at records and there’s some things driving them. One is the AI ecosystem. So everyone started to gravitate towards anything tangential to AI and the ecosystem supporting it whether it’s the capital expenditures, semiconductors, cloud computing. So technology related ETFs have about I think 50 billion of inflows. That’s an all-time record because investors started to position for this productivity miracle that’s out on the horizon. But you also saw as a result of the macro landscape with the war in Iran, the the impact on supply chains, the impact on energy infrastructure around Venezuela as well, we saw a massive amount of sector dispersion that hadn’t been there because it had been such a tech heliocentric market where it was just basically tech or bust. But now you have the energy sector up 40% this year. You have the industrial sector led by aerospace and defense companies up quite significantly as well. You have materials companies as a result of the impacts on the comp commodity complex doing well. So we start to see more cyclical exposures doing well as well. So if you look at industrials, they have 10 billion. Materials have about 11 billion. And then one thing that’s come up of late as the AI trade has extended beyond the sort of first order magnitude of semis and cloud into the ecosystem that could benefit from it in terms of healthcare stocks and biotech. So healthcare and biotech stocks are areas that have had really strong flows over the last three months and more so in that biotech industry where they’ve are at record inflows and are finally after years of being impacted because of high interest rates maybe some weak profitability where if you started from 2023 there are net outflows they’ve actually on that cumulative basis have just turned into inflows. So we are seeing more usage of sectors to position tactically because it is a more dispersed return environment where you have both macro factors impacting it but also the AI trade really creating a expansive opportunity set to position because the range of outcomes in terms of AI issuingly wide and so you’re seeing investors position based on their thesis. And again, if anybody has any questions, I’ll ask you to go to the mics in the final few minutes. But it I always look at the world sort of it’s somewhat binary in terms of there only so many investment dollars to go around and obviously you know we talk about it semis AI dominates the landscape sometimes to the detriment of other sectors. You just brought up biotech but is it that binary or do you see things around the edges that are starting to emerge sort of outside biotech and those types of things? Well, within sectors, you do see a lot a good deal of rotation. So, you’ll see, you know, buying in one and selling the other. There’s a lot of sector rotation strategies out there. We definitely have seen areas where there’s out of favor. So, not everything in the ETF has an arrow pointing up. You see outflows in consumer stocks, consumer discretionary, consumer staples. Those those areas of the marketplace have been hit hard as a result of rising consumer prices. Even though consumption is quite strong, we do see margin compression in those spaces. and the underlying stock performance has been quite low. We’ve seen a limited amount of investment. I think on the same on the same token when looking at it even within the fixed income space given how tight credit spreads are even though there’s a thirst and a demand for yield, we’ve seen outflows into high yield and a lot of that just has to do with there’s not much spread compression left and we’ve seen more rotations into ultrashort government bond funds because you can get roughly about a 4% yield without taking on as much volatility. So it isn’t just you know ETFs are hitting records and everything is arrow pointing up. There are some areas that are witnessing outflows and a lot of it has to do with some of the tactical positioning based on market trends. Artificial intelligence again topic we talk about. How is it impacting your life your job stage all those different things that the industry? Yeah I mean there’s there’s a lot to that and I know we only have five and a half minutes left to go through it. I think one thing for me is I I do fear that the ETF due diligence will be offloaded to AI where you just ask a prompt of tell me the best ETF for uh clean energy and the AI model and I don’t know how every one of them’s trained but we’ll go and look through marketing material and larger firms now I’m a larger firm so maybe I shouldn’t be saying this but larger firms have more marketing material so you might not actually get what would be the best and it still requires a lot of work. So we might become just too reliant on AI to service up our best investment offering because it’s being trained on you know marketing material and other language and news articles and you actually might miss the signal through a lot of that noise. So that’s one thing I I do fear of that a of AI and the use of it. we just become too, you know, used to just typing in our prompt and getting our answer back and taking it as gospel. I mean, I I I’m susceptible to that as well. I think from an investment management perspective, we’re using AI within our walls to manage some of the portfolios in terms of understanding trade ration, understanding what is the inventory out on offer for some of our bond portfolios. So, it has helped from a capacity perspective. No doubt you have to be excited about what you do, otherwise you shouldn’t be doing it. And you know, we had a conversation prior to this. We’ve had a couple calls. You’re clearly excited about it. What do you see like the continued innovation we talked about, but what sort of gets you jazzed about your role in the industry right now? Yeah. So, I think it’s a little bit of, you know, I’ll use a reference. I probably shouldn’t and everyone would just say I shouldn’t use this but you know in the movie you know there will be blood Daniel plain vu goes and tells you know Elijah that I drink your milkshake and I want to have that moment for and again I have friends in the industry we have our own mutual funds but we’re going to do that to mutual funds ETFs will drink mutual funds as milkshake and what I mean by that is right now globally mutual funds are around 40 trillion where we are from a trajectory perspective and our growth we have 2.3 trillion on target for this year. That’s my projection. We have had 7 trillion of inflows over the last 10 years. Mutual funds have had outflows. You can only compound from a market return perspective the equity risk premium for so long and build your assets. You you start you need to have investment as well and ETF and investors are using the ETF to build portfolios. So our projections by 2035 the global ETF industry will be bigger than the global mutual fund industry and we will then solidify as the default deacto primary tool to build portfolios. not just for index exposures or tactical trading, but also for active building outcome to asset allocation and just be that sort of one-stop shop. So, that is what I’m excited for cuz I love to make predictions. Uh I I like putting out forecast. I like being wrong. I like being directionally correct, but I want to sort of put that out there and be like, “Yeah, we called that a good 10 years ago and we nailed it.” I I can’t speak intelligently about the genesis of ETFs. My instincts suggest they were built as an again in for investment portfolios, but they become you just said for tactical traders, it’s a critical part of what he or she does on a daily basis. Does that surprise you or is that sort of the evolution? No, it doesn’t surprise me at all. And if anyone we can go chapter and verse on the creation of ETFs uh because we launched the first one in the US and a lot of it has to do with the SEC reading um regulatory review books and policies out of the flash crash from 1987 and trying to solve for uh a basically physically listed futures contract to stop programmatic trading from having massive amounts of draw downs in the broader equity market. So having physical collateral to back a futures contract that’s sort of the 22nd version. And so if you think about it from that perspective, it was a trading vehicle. It was an access vehicle. It was to help traders position in severe periods of market turmoil. And that 100% remains today. We see a strong correlation between the average VIX level and ETF trading volumes. We see it within our suite because we have just so many liquid products across our sectors, our gold franchise, all in S&P franchise, all of these different things. We see a very strong correlation when markets fall, volatility spikes, investors rush into the ETF ecosystem to transfer risk in real time between willing buyers and sellers with transparent vehicles with trading costs of about a basis point and reposition portfolios based on their current market view. And we have seen that through many many many different market environments. And there was years ago, if we had this conference maybe 10 years ago, we would have had probably a whole panel of like, do ETFs cause market draw downs? Can they actually withstand systemic market risk? And we would have won up here and we would have showed how that claim or that narrative would be wrong. Now, we don’t have to do that because we’ve lived through so many of these. And ETFs have passed the test time and time and time again. And we definitely see them utilized as trading vehicles, as wealth accumulation vehicles, income generation vehicles. They really are sort of that army knife in terms of building portfolios, structuring portfolios, and helping position for whatever the market brings next. It’s always good to be on set with a fellow paiz ladies and gentlemen, Matt Bardellini. Thanks, folks. We’ll see you a little bit later. Thank you, Matt. Thank you.
Another round for Guyami and Matt Bolini.
All right. Right. Well, we just spent some time looking at how investments product investment products are evolving. Uh but now we’re going to talk about something even more fundamental to the market when you can actually trade. And this is obviously, you know, we launched 245 a couple years ago and everyone’s talking about how do we get more access to the markets? How do we expand trading opportunities? talked about the keynote last night, how news and everything that happens over the weekend overnight. So, how do you actually build an always on market? And so we’re going to talk with uh the CEO of Bruce Markets, Jason Wallik, and he’s going to sit down with our very own Robin Hood chief brokerage officer, Steve Quirk, and we are going to discuss how markets never sleep, the evolution of market access with Robin Hood and Bruce Markets.
big, but our names are little. Yes. How we doing? Good. Did you guys sleep last night? Uh, yeah. Got some some sleep. Okay. The markets didn’t, but but we did. So, uh, I I’m Steve Quirk, chief brokerage officer here at Robin Hood. Been here for about five years. Um, with me is Jason. I’m going to let him tell you about his journey and let him, uh, kind of introduce himself. Thanks, Q. Uh, thanks for having me here as well. Um, Jason Wallock. I’m the CEO at Bruce Markets. Uh, we are an equity ATS that operates during the overnight trading session. Uh we run five sessions a week. Uh they start at 8:00 p.m. Eastern on Sunday night, running through 4:00 a.m. uh Friday morning. Uh as you heard last night, that is evolving over the next few months uh as we begin our journey with Robin Hood as our partner to uh support Robin Hood to fill the gap and offer a 247 trading week. Um so it’s really exciting. Uh I’ve spent most of my career on the electronic trading side uh mostly with equities but um have focused a lot of my time on um innovative opportunities to continue to propel our market structure forward. um enhancing things like execution quality um access and um addressing growing demand uh really across the globe for uh products uh access and um you know evolving opportunity. Yeah, I think this is going to be a fun session because um like J Jason can describe a lot of what like it you know people just have an assumption that you know hey we would of course everybody wants to be able to to act on news that happens in the after hours or on weekends but um there’s a lot that goes into providing that capability and so we can we can lean on him to dig into that a little bit. But I think just setting the table, um, we we’ve always known, you know, that there’s a gap that exists for people who want to be able to take advantage of of opportunities that are happening on weekends. And like there are a lot of market moving headlines, you saw some last night, that are happening on the weekend. We we covered, you know, the 245 session. We the the weekend’s been the gap um in terms of our volumes. And I’ll let Jason talk about volumes overall. You know, the volumes have continued to grow from retail customers um both here in the US but also globally u that have interest in many of the names that are most popularly traded across the globe. But I think what we’ve noticed is behave from a behavior standpoint. There are a lot of event driven you know volume spikes. But if you said, “What’s the busiest day of of of the overnight session that currently exists?” It’s Sunday night. Now, we can all figure out why because you have two days of news bunched up. So, right away at 8:00 p.m. when that market opens, there’s there’s a lot of activity based on what’s happening. So, I mean, that itself paints a picture of why, you know, the weekend is so important. I think the other um areas where we see real big spikes in volume in the overnight session are earnings. When Nvidia has earnings, huge numbers, you know, because of course you get the the results, you get the guidance, but then there’s the reaction to the guidance that sometimes moves that stock in ways that people um didn’t assume it was going to move it in. And then uh when there’s events, you know, any of the events that have been happening that are geopolitical events or other events just spike volume like crazy. And uh Jason and I were talking about this a little bit last night. Um you know, the skepticism around the clock trading has always been, oh, who needs to be trading at 2:30 a.m. and you know, is the liquidity there? Those the liquidity question has been answered. There is liquidity there. But as as far as um who needs to be trading at those hours, like if you think about it through the lens of a of a Robin Hood customer who’s newer to investing, um we have 28 million customers. Half of them are brand new to brokerage. Um they’re actually kind of puzzled by a model where this market isn’t open all the time. Many of the asset classes already are crypto and others. And so, you know, Amazon doesn’t close. Why would they? It’s an electronic marketplace, right? Um, and so in their mind, if I do my research and stock ABC I think is a great buying opportunity at $10 and I set a limit price to buy it at $10, I really don’t care if I buy it at 3:00 a.m. or at 2 p.m. It doesn’t it just doesn’t matter to me. Um, where where I think the the narrative kind of went for a while with people was, oh, you know, people are going to be day trading at 3:00 a.m., you know, back and forth. That’s not really what we see happening. So, I’ll I’ll kind of let you expand on that a little bit. Yeah, I mean, I think you hit the nail on the head. The market moving news does not stop. It is a 247 business, right? And it it is delivered faster than ever and more broadly than ever, right? This is a global world that we’re operating in. You also have, you know, global corporations listed in the US that are trading on our markets and the news breaking, you know, during their normal business hours. But I think one of the pieces you talked about really was was that the access, the element, the the convenience, the optionality, right? In the US, you’ve got investors that, you know, may want to come home from work and be with their families, cook dinner, put the children to bed, and ultimately by the time they have the opportunity to actually sit down, evaluate their portfolio, evaluate market news, and react, it’s past what have tradition have been traditional market hours, right? To be able to have that convenience and that flexibility to do it according to one schedule. It’s proven itself and you’ve seen it with the volume. The overnight trading volume across three ATS’s that we track, Bruce included, um, year-over-year from August August has gone from 22 million shares a night uh, to roughly 109 million shares a night uh, across those three ATS’s. Uh, and from a notional perspective, we’re looking at 1.2 billion in executed notional uh, to 5 billion in executed notional. So that’s nearly a 400% increase um from a volume perspective. Um so the demand is there. It’s growing. It’s largely uh thanks to the resiliency that has been provided to the market but also the reduction and the barriers of entry from firms like Robin Hood um that have promoted this and really provided the access to the customers. Um the other piece I would say is you know you talk about like why would somebody want to trade at 2 a.m. Right? And so when we think about that question, we like to use a a metaphor about driving. So I’m going to ask you a few questions here. Um Q and I share a home state of Wisconsin. We’re Packer fans. Packer fans. Not a very good year, but hey, we’re going to we’re going to fix that. There we go. Hopefully. Indeed. So I take it you still have family in Wisconsin. I have much many family in Wisconsin. And you drive back to Wisconsin from time to time. I do. How often do you drive at two o’clock in the morning back to Wisconsin? I try to avoid it. I would think so. But in the event of something similar to what you mentioned, a corporate event, let’s say the death of a CEO, the uh you know, a a disruption to production, but a family event where ultimately you wanted to drive back at 2:00 in the morning, you would. Mhm. And at the time you’d be happy to know that your vehicle is there insured, fueled up, safe, reliable, resilient, ready to go. Yep. Correct. Yep. Well, the same thing holds true for an investor, right? Whether that’s retail or institutional, right? Just because the market is 24/7 doesn’t mean you need to trade every second of the day. But to have these opportunities available because news has turned into such a 247 quickly distributed product, right? These opportunities are there. So, the confidence that you gain being able to drive back at 2 a.m. with that reliable vehicle is the same confidence that we want to instill to investors with the platform we’re offering, the partnership with Robin Hood to make sure that access is available as news breaks um and investors can, you know, feel confident in their ability to manage that portfolio. Yeah, I think I f first thing I I would say is our customers, we know this, 60% of them do their homework, education, research when the market’s not open. And so they’re a little puzzled that they can’t put that, you know, make that trade or investment, you know, when they are doing that research. So this is kind of their sweet spot. But I would also say if you think about it, the news cycle, the technology, everything has moved here and the the hours haven’t caught up to it, right? I have a phone that gives me information 24/7. I have uh the ability to act on that 24/7, but I need to be able to do it, you know, in a liquid marketplace that’s open. And so it’s just playing catch-up and and you know, we’re going to close that gap. Um, I thought what would be a really fun thing to do cuz Jason is a student of history is um is to do a little little quiz before I let him uh unleash his uh historical knowledge on us. Um, here’s the question. And by the way, there’s going to be a prize. I think it’s a t-shirt or a hat from the uh from the store. Um, has there been equity trading on weekends? I see a couple. Oh, here it is. Okay. Uh, and I see a couple people from exchanges in here, so no cheating. We’re not going to call on you. Uh, has there been equity trading on weekends previously? And if so, what year did that start? Closest to the pin here? Anybody? And there’s mics up here or you can just yell out or stick your hand up. And by the way, there’s no harm in taking a guess. You get a hat and a and a shirt. So, Sorry, I couldn’t hear you. 2006. 2006. Okay, another one here. Any other guesses?
- Let me guide you. 2012. I I would go the other way. We’re getting close. These prices, right, rules or where? I think you’re winning. Go ahead. Let’s go there. So yes, we’re going back to the 1800s here. But you know, I think it’s really interesting. You know, we’re going to talk a lot about the development of technology and the to support growing demand. And if you look at the history of our markets, that’s exactly the story that’s told. So you go back to 1792. 1792, you’ve got the Buttonwood Agreement, right? Essentially the birth of the New York Stock Exchange, right? At the time and for the next almost 80 years, markets don’t trade on a continuous basis. There is no ability even during set market hours to trade you know throughout that session. It is one or two call auctions a day. Everything concentrated to those two events. It’s not until um 1871 that you actually see the introduction of continuous trading and that was 5 hours a day. Few years later in 1887 a Saturday session was launched two hours 10 to 12 on Saturday and this continued uh until 1952 right Saturday session was over. We started to see the birth of an actual like 5day trading week as we know it now. Now go into the 60s. This is where the popularity of trading begins to pick up. And now remember at the time all of this is a manual process right including not only the trading side but the back office side as well. So significant amounts of manual processing significant amounts of paperwork. In the 60s the trading gets so popular we see 10 to 13 million shares a day trading. Just to put things in perspective in September I think we’re averaging roughly 17 billion shares a day. So things have come a long way but at the time with that manual processing that was a lot. So what happens 1968 Wednesdays get shut down. So we go to a 4-day trading week. Really interesting. And that was really known as the paperwork crisis. So they needed Wednesdays to actually catch up on the back office. Fast forward a little later in the 60s we start to see the introduction of extended hours trading, right? And ultimately it’s really an institutional space and this is after hours where you know large asset managers are matching trades to um you know fine natural counterparties. 1985 we see the establishment of the 9:30 to 4 trading day as we knew it I should say right uh and then what things get really interesting in the ‘9s in the 2000s. He’s looking at me cuz I may have been around during that period. That’s what that look was. So, in the 90s and 2000s, you have the online brokerage platforms addressing retail demand and having a major influence on our actual market structure, right? We start to see the pre-market and the postmarket expand. And over those years, we end up with what was the 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. trading day. Now, obviously, we are in a world where we have 245, and in a few months, we will have 24/7. um thanks to Robin Hood here. And so it it’s really interesting as you look back on this history and you see how technology has been forced to keep up with demand, how the markets have really committed themselves to doing so. And it speaks to really what our mission is here with Bruce, which is a commitment to make sure that our equity markets really stay in front of what is this global opportunity, this multi-asset ecosystem where all of these assets, whether we’re talking about her or futures or crypto or equities, um I’m sure eventually options and fix them, these these coexist and that coexistence creates opportunities. Um, and so it’s not about whether one asset class is is better than the other or this or that. They coexist and their opportunities and their tools for investors to really manage their their in their portfolio. Um, and so using that technology, we’re determined to make sure that our equity markets really stay up top. Yeah. But I think you brought it up the basis for even if you want option trading, you know, to to follow suit, the basis for that is having the equities because you need reference. Absolutely. And so that’s that’s going to be important. But um in terms of the roll out um you know the the way that we’re going to proceed will be with a limited number of symbols and then quickly ramping up as liquidity becomes more of you know as we become more comfortable with the liquidity. But it’s all it’s this is the same way we we rolled out 245. So we’ll follow a similar model. But you should anticipate that, you know, the the the goal is to get to the full suite of uh tradable assets that exist in the in the uh normal session, the day session, if you will. Um but I’m Jason, I know we talked a little bit last night after, you know, the the announcement and I know you had a lot of interest from a lot of entities and you know, I don’t know how much you want to go into there, you know, both in the US but also globally. Yes. Well, your news from last night has made its way across the globe and you know, I woke up this morning to inbound interest um from several firms um in the APAC region um especially South Korea which you know I think has made the news several times is a large participant in in our equity markets. we now have historical high levels of of interest globally uh to invest in our markets and and you know that is again as I said part to you know the opportunities at the market level but also the the reduced barrier of entry that brokers have offered today um so it’s growing but you know it puts on us really a a mandate to make sure that we are delivering a solution that can be trusted globally as well right not only by your customers but all of these investors around the globe that help create a healthy market ecosystem, right? The more liquidity, the more participation you get, the more competitive you get at the market level. And that’s ultimately what drives uh compression of spreads, right? Better prices for investors. It forces firms like Bruce to be innovative, right? To bring opportunities just like this weekend trading for the first time. And that’s coming as a result of the demand that’s coming from retail. You know, when we think about change in our marketplace, it really comes from from two things. One would be a regulatory mandate, right? Regulators change a rule. We react. We have to build. We deliver. Everyone has to be compliant by an effective date. The other is a market-based solution, right? 245 trading and now 24/7 trading. That’s exactly what that is. It’s addressing demand and delivering to the market a solution that we as market participants know is in the greater interest. And in order to do that, you really have to continue to build to deliver institutional-grade technology, right? To deliver a customer experience that has that confidence and forces them to adopt. Look at what the retail investor community has done with 245 so far. We have exchanges reacting. exchanges will be live during the overnight trading session in the next few months. You have the institutional community reacting to this news, preparing to participate. So, the overall market is just going to continue to get bigger and create more opportunity for the participants. Yeah. And I I I think what could be interesting for the audience here is there like how does this happen? like what what has to happen you know just from a like a a background standpoint for this to be facilitated like who had because obviously there are counterparties you know with respect to market all these things that are important to make sure it is a robust and liquid market it doesn’t just happen we can’t just will it to happen so like just I mean not too wonky but you know so yeah so so there’s a lot more than just keeping the lights on for two days is really the way to think about. So um it starts with the technology right for the matching engine itself. So Bruce ATS you know uh what we do is essentially accept orders from brokers such as Robin Hood. We put out our market data so that you know brokers like market data and their customers can see you know the bids and the offers that sit in our book when opportunities arrive for orders to cross. That’s essentially what we do. We serve as the marketplace for affecting those transactions and we complete all of the required reporting to the tape. Um so you can see all the last sale information. Uh we uh required reports to regulators to back office services so on and so forth. So uh at its core we are the marketplace. Now in order to make that happen there’s more than just as I said keeping the lights on, right? There’s a clearing side of things. So we have to work closely on the clearing side to make sure that the back office process the risk associated with that interacting with the central clearing party you know all of that is available. We’re working closely with regulators to make sure that what we’re delivering um is one compliant but also recognized is in the interest of you know a prog a progressing and and modernizing equity market. Um but also as you mentioned liquidity right as I mention the more liquidity the better that is for all of the investors involved. Um, so we’re working closely with large liquidity providers to ensure that there’s a concentrated and and healthy book of liquidity available for participants when this launches later this year. And I think that that’s the one thing that we’ve had experience with is um, you know, the liquidity providers, the market makers that are going to be there to provide that essential liquidity. when you think about it, they actually have to take a little bit of a leap of faith because you don’t know what that volume is going to look like. Um but I think in talking to many of them and we have for years they’ve been very pleasantly surprised by how much growth there has been and uh how robust that you know trading at least as uh demand is from a and we can only say from a retail side because we’re not institution but you know I think from the institution side you’re having the same you know conversations and um and demand Right. It it it’s taken a little longer to get there, but certainly, you know, this was a retail phenomenon. This was driven by demand at the retail side both internationally and and domestically and and we’ve seen that in the growth. The institutional side is responding. And I think it’s really interesting that, you know, retail has become such a force representing, you know, 20 to 30% of our our our traded volume every day in our markets coming from retail. there’s an opportunity to truly affect the future of our market structure here and we’re seeing that in real time um with with 247 trading and so you know we’re excited to be part of that we’re excited to welcome the institutional community in and and there is budding interest there and as I mentioned um the exchanges will be here soon so yes we are watching a maturing market ecosystem um that has really been driven by by retail investors I find that fascinating to think when you think about asset classes and capabilities Many of them start with institutions and retail is kicking the door saying I want in, I want in, I want in. Like you know, traditional futures, you know, those were really not designed for retail customers initially and retail customers now have, you know, are a decent participant there. But then you have other asset classes which are completely uh retail and then institutions are adopting those. think of event contracts and some of those things which now you know 100% retail and now institutions are are working their way in. It’s always fascinating to see which way this goes, you know, which which is the starting point. But I think to your point with retail continuing to be a bigger and bigger percentage of of volumes in every asset class, I my anticipation is it’s going to be driven by retail more so basically everybody here. Um, so we only have a couple minutes left. We have three microphones that are in each aisle. Curious if anybody has questions uh on any facet of of this trading uh that uh they would like to ask. I would give you another t-shirt, but I don’t have one. But I can get one
for the first question. Oh, here we go. All right. Um, so this is a very specific question. I trade at all hours and I’ve noticed that sometimes when I do um orders, it’s only market orders. You can’t trade limit orders. Is that going to be changed or different when we have the 24 or 25? You know, the when the Bruce markets open? We I think it’s only limit orders, not market orders, right? Oh, I’m sorry. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It’s a great question. So, if you look at our broader market structure, the concept of a market order, the availability of it really doesn’t exist outside of the core session. Um, that’s one of the protections that has been in place for investors for many years. Um, it has not changed. Um, that is not part of our current launch plan. Whether that changes in the future, we will see. Um the reason I really like the question though is that as I mentioned we have this this growing level of competition amongst this overnight ecosystem with the exchanges coming on board. So it is a question that could be asked as we see this evolve and we see this continuous trading day um continue to develop we may see um changes of that nature but for the moment it we’re going to remain limit orders only. Yeah, I think I think the rationale was it’s not you know when it starts it’s not going to be as robust as the day session. So those protections are in place so that you don’t gap gap a stock. Um but I would anticipate that if we get to a a place where these where the volumes are similar to what they are in the day then the capabilities would be similar as they are in a day as well. So, thank you. Of course. And by the way, what are you trading all night? Individual stocks that I already own. Oh, that’s very cool. Is it based on news or just that’s your um news after hours? Sometimes Yep. You know, when futures start? Yep. It It’s very volatile and I find that sometimes I can get out of positions before opening. Ah, got it. Okay. Very cool. Thanks for the question. Hello. Hi. Yeah. So, for the timing of the market, has that been mostly driven by regulation or just back office reconciling, that kind of thing? The the timing of this of being this capability being launched, right? Yeah. I I’ll let Yeah. So I mean part of it was uh regulation historically but right now you know obviously everything we’re doing is pending regulatory review but from a technology perspective there’s no reason the market should be closed. We’ve seen that with other asset classes. Equity certainly um you know where we’ve been at the forefront of this uh for for years and years and years in the US um continues to be there should be there. The technology can support it. From a regulatory perspective there’s actually nothing preventing us from putting a trade up on a Saturday today. But we do work closely to make sure that the solution we bring to market um again is in line with expectations. there’s clear understandings and also investor protections and market integrity always being top of mind globally. globally. Um, are you guys working with other markets globally to also enable this or it’s a what we’ve seen I think as the US has really set a model here. We’ve set a standard um and Bruce, you know, came out of the gate when we launched in 2025. Our goal was to deliver a new standard in in overnight trading with the institutional grade technology with our consortium of strategic partners, Robin Hood, Peak 6, um firms that have stood behind um our business uh and and brought solutions to their clients um making sure you know that it is something that they feel confident and shows the resiliency that the market deserves. What we’ve now seen is we’ve seen the first levels of interest coming out of markets such as London and Korea where we’re we’re hearing of interest in developing 245 solutions you know in those jurisdictions. Um I think the news from last night of uh the US uh starting to go towards 24/7 um really will get some further interest but yes I expect develops developments in these other jurisdictions as well. Thanks. Thanks for the question. Yeah good one more. Uh so you said revenue or trading re revenue went up 400%. Who’s the majority of that increase? So the stat I spoke to was the increase in trading volume overnight. So uh we track three ATS’s that operate during the overnight trading session. Of course, Bruce being one of them. Um it’s the executed volume on those three ATS’s from August to August was up 389% to be very specific. Yeah. But you’re you’re saying who’s the composition of it? Who’s the main like is that institutions retail? It’s it’s primarily a retail market at this point plus um we’ll call liquidity providers and market makers. Um we’re beginning to see the introduction of the institutional community as I mentioned. Um, one of the stats we find really interesting, uh, is that the overnight market is is an anomaly in that retail is actually trading with retail. So, as we look at our stats, we see retail versus retail on what we estimate is about 25% of the shares traded. Um, which is a really interesting factor of the overnight. Um, that will change over time as institutions come on board and the market expands, but um, it’s a very very retail driven market at the moment. Thank you. Cool. I think that wraps it up. I want to thank Jason for for being here. Uh appreciate it and uh look forward to um to doing a lot more. Likewise. Yeah. Thank you. And thanks for coming. Thanks everybody. Appreciate it.
Thank you. Thanks Jason. Thanks everyone. We’re almost at lunch, but we have one more really great session coming up here. We just went behind the scenes on the always on equity market, but for our next session, we’re staying behind the scenes, but moving over to my favorite market, the futures market. And this is easily my favorite transition of the day because apparently I don’t have to go anywhere. So, we’re bringing one of trading’s leading podcast, Chat with Traders. Anyone listen to hear of Chat with Traders? Highly recommend it. They talk to some fantastic old school traders that uh have been very successful. a lot of the market wizards, a lot of uh former professional traders. And so we’re taking that and we’re bottling up into a fun discussion here where we take the point of view of a retail trader, the point of view of a market maker, and the point of view of the exchange in between. So joining me are Kevin Avery, host of Chat with Traders, Rob Kramer, president and CEO of Geneva Trading, and Craig Buick, senior director and global head of retail education at CME Group. And we’re going inside the futures market from your screen to the exchange to the market maker on the other side. This is chat with traders one trade three perspectives sponsored by our friends at CME Group.
Welcome Houston. How are we doing? How many here have heard of Chat with Traders? Show of hands. Yes, let’s go. Well, hey, I’m Kevin Avery, host of Chat with Traders, and the theme of this year’s summit, engines of creation. And it’s very fitting when you look at how Robin Hood keeps innovating and creating. One reason Robin Hood keeps innovating is that its people are also its customers. You guys saw firsthand Steve Quirk. Q was on just a second ago. I love Q. In fact, we learned last night he invented the QR code. He’s great. So, he was on Chat with Traders. Amazing insight. And Robin Hood started by serving a generation of firsttime investors. That’s you. That’s you. The 1500 people that showed up here today, that’s the reason we exist and were able to were able to do this. So give yourselves a round of applause.
You know, Robin Hood, they introduced it was mobile first and then commissionfree access. They’re increasingly sophisticated tools and they continue to push and democratize markets for more people. As Q put it, the playing field has been leveled. Well, today we’re taking one futures trade and we’re looking at it from three different perspectives. We have Obie, the retail trader, Rob, the professional market maker, and then Craig, the exchange perspective at CME Group. So, let’s meet the panel.
Obie, I want to start with you. You’re Robin Hood’s education lead, but you’re also a trader and a Robin Hood customer yourself. So give us a little background on your path into the markets and what your role looks like today. Now be next year 20 years in the retail brokerage industry. I started in 2007 at a a firm in Chicago that focused on options trading uh and found my way to a futures desk around 2010. So speaking of markets never sleep, I worked two years on an overnight trading desk. So I literally didn’t sleep for two years. Um and that’s where I got involved in the futures market and helping customers you know whether it was placing orders monitoring the order routing uh work you know working with uh customer service teams overnight uh but during that time I got interested in trading futures and going through the same path as you guys like I’ve never been on on Rob’s side of the desk um I’ve gone through the same journey and fits and starts and I tried this indicator and then I changed to this uh strategy and went from this product to that. Uh has helped me as an education lead hopefully create good content, engaging content that helps get you guys from A to Z and to a point where hopefully you can be a successful trader. Excellent. Now Rob, you joined Geneva Trading as a trader yourself in 2001 and eventually you became president and CEO. So for someone who may not know Geneva, what does the firm do and how how did you get into this role? So the the firm has evolved as as you would expect over the years. We’ve been at this for 27 years now. Um the firm is a principal trading firm. So we trade our own capital. We’re not managing money for anyone else. And at the core of what we do is to identify and develop professional trading talent. and we support them with our capital and professional trading technologies uh to allow them to become successful. The firm is is a diversified organization. So we have groups that are focused purely on market making. We have those that are doing systematic trading or algorithmic trading and those that are also discretionary trading. So we’re involved in all aspects of it. As for your question about how I got into it, I was really I mean it was almost a fluke. I um spent the first part of my career in the tech space. I was a tech entrepreneur. Um and a friend of mine, one of the co-founders of Geneva gave me the opportunity or encouraged me to come over and see what he wanted to do and how he wanted to build a an electronic trading firm. And I went over and I was taught to trade by him. First went over in late 2000 and started in 2001 and the journey just kind of evolved from there. Excellent. Now, hey, Craig, you’re the global head of retail education at CME Group. So, give us a little background on your career and at a high level, what does CME, you know, what do they play in the futures ecosystem? Yeah, so I started in futures and options right out of college. So, I’ve been in it my entire adult life, uh, going back to the mid9s as it were. And in fact, I’ve known Rob, it’s a small community back in Chicago. We’ve known each other for probably 25 years. Um but most recently I spent about nine years at one of the market making firms in Chicago. Um and then joined uh CME in 2016 in this retail role. I think what’s kind of interesting about that story is that in 2016 the role was kind of sold to me as retail is a high priority at CME. uh we see it as a growth area at CME and that was true but we couldn’t have possibly predicted what was going to happen in the last five or six years uh with the explosion in in retail trading. So, it’s really been a fun ride. And as far as CM Group itself goes, uh, by many measures, we’re the largest futures and options exchange in the world. Um, by volume, I think by market cap, but I think more important to maybe this crowd, I think we also offer arguably the most diverse set of products among any futures exchange in the world. So, you can trade equity indexes, you can trade single stock futures, interest rates, foreign currencies, things with feet like pigs and cows, metals, energies, uh, cryptocurrency futures. So really there’s a lot of different options for people that want exposure to all these different things. Excellent. And we’re going to get into why futures too, but Obie, let’s go back to you on, you know, how does not only leading education at Robin Hood, but you’re also a customer. You know, we learn I learned that with Steve Quirk in my interview with him. You know, they’re c Robin Hood’s so customer ccentric and they focus on the customers, but they’re the trader themselves and that’s how they know how to bring that product to the market. So, how does that change the way you think about educating traders and then building out these future products? Yeah, I mean, well, first off, I want to get a sense. How many people here trade futures? How many people are curious about futures? And then how many people are like, I have no idea what a future is. Okay, that’s a good mix. Um, you know, I I think I like to use analogies, so I apologize. There’ll be a lot of analogies over the next 51 minutes, but this reminds me of like when um like a golf equipment company like a Tailor Made or Callaway or something are building clubs for golf. They work with the Rory Mroys and the Scotty Shefflers and they hit clubs and they hit them and hit them and they the feedback from the golfer to the the builder creates this wonderful cycle that hopefully puts a fantastic product in someone’s hand to execute a job. And when I think of Robin Hood’s trading products, like that’s what we’re trying to do. We’re trying to build the best trading platform so that you can execute a job or a task as a trader. The product itself does not make you a good trader, but a bad product harm basically stops you from being a good trader. So, we’re trying to make the best experience possible. And when I sit down with the product teams, you know, they come to me and other um you know, people within the firm that trade futures and we’re like a focus group for them. So the same things you guys want OCOs and these indicators and custom charting and and all of that like we are advocating for that from the inside on top of your guys’s feedback. So I think it’s just once again having a someone who understands the product as a trader but then also being on the other side of uh the role in terms of working with the product teams and engineers. It’s just a great development cycle. Perfect. And you know Craig you were speaking about how this market has just exploded the future space you know why do you think retail participation you said over the last 5 years I mean why do you think it has grown tremendously what makes these products attractive to the individual trader today? Yeah, I think that’s a great question particularly for for this panel because I think what makes futures attractive to individuals is the same thing that makes them attractive to the institutional players, right? And we’ve got to start with the capital efficiency of futures. So, it’s this idea that you can make your money go further. And and I think whether you’re OB, whether you’re a proprietary trading firm like Geneva, whether you’re an international bank or hedge fund, we’re all capital constrained at some point. And futures have that capital efficient nature to them. Now again we never talk about that and another way to say that quite frankly is leverage and we never talk about that without also talking about the other side right which means that you have to be a very strict disciplined trader when you’re trading with these products. So that’s that’s I think the main reason that people are attracted to futures and then beyond that is the 24-hour access. Um and and then I think in the last 5 to 10 years the access in general, right? We have firms like Robin Hood that are now providing the technology and the access to these products that make it just easier and more approachable uh for individual traders. And I think we’re going to get into the sizing that we’ve done uh in a little bit. Yeah. And a follow-up question to that, Craig, I mean, you you say futures are very, you know, they’re capital efficient. we can control more notional exposure with less capital. But is that also what can get some people in trouble is having that amount of leverage? Sure. And we never sugarcoat that. Um we think it’s an attribute that does attract a lot of people to futures. So for example, let’s say you wanted exposure to the S&P and you were looking at the spider ETF or or the E- mini. Well, if you’re trading on margin, as they say in the stock market, you’re required to put up at least 50% of that exposure that you get. Well, if you’re looking at that same exposure in the futures market, that’s more like five or 6%. So, in order to hold the same amount of exposure, you put up less money. Well, that means that you’re also risking that money. So, again, you do have to be a very strict risk manager when you are trading these more sophisticated products. Absolutely. Now, Rob, I want to come to you. You’ve developed and hired traders who’ve achieved 8 figure results. you were telling us and you know what’s the role of a market maker in this industry? Are you simply making the market or is there more involved in it? Do you actually take directional trades and have bias there? Well, it’s it’s our organi organization now is quite complex. So, we have uh market making groups and directional trading groups. um a market maker. You know, if you really think about it, there are times when uh individuals, farmers, oil companies want to come to a market and they need to hedge and there’s not liquidity there for them. We provide that liquidity. We provide two-sided markets in the products that we trade. We we try to provide fast fair prices for everyone. Um but but of course we do have in in doing that and doing it well perhaps a directional bias. It might be shaped by our own risk and inventory we have on what we’re seeing in the market and it could be informed by a lot of correlated or other other markets that we’re observing. So our approach is very complex. Okay. Now Obie I want to come back to you because now we just heard the professional side. Let’s get some the retail angle on this. And what do you think a key difference is between a trader like you, trader like Rob? Yeah. I mean, you just think about the concept of a professional versus retailer. Let’s just use sports again, like a professional versus an amateur. You know, if I was playing a round of golf with the world number one Scotty Shuffler, and we went to a tea box, right? We both have a club, a ball, and we’re playing the same hole. I may look down the fairway and say, “Man, I just want to hit the ball straight and far, and hopefully it goes where I’m hoping it goes.” Scotty might get on the T- box and say, “All right, wind’s coming out of the right. I’ve got water left. I’ve got a bunker at 280. I’m going to pull a 3-wood, land it on the right side of the fairway because the tea is back left on the green.” the amount of times that a professional does something, it creates a habit and a routine and a process where it’s like breathing for them. I think for newer traders and retail traders, there’s a mix of still learning the fundamentals while putting on risk and understanding the craziness of the market. The your brain our brains are just not as adept to make all those decisions. Plus the amount of resources that a professional firm has, which I think with the launch of all the agents and and everything that we’re doing is starting to narrow that gap. So, at the end of the day, Kevin, it’s really about if this is going to be your full-time job, there’s just such an advantage to that versus, hey, I’m going to trade 1 hour a day as sort of like a side of the plate task or, you know, even using the word hobby. Like, trading futures really isn’t a hobby. You really have to uh you know approach it with some some discipline and rigor. Excellent. Love that. Hey, I just want to quick note for the audience. We have three microphones here. So, while we’re in discussion, go ahead and think of some questions you may have and towards the end we’ll do a Q&A. So, we’ll you’ll line up at these mics and just go ahead and line up towards the end in about 20 30 minutes and I’ll point you out. Now, Rob, I want to go back to you. So retail traders sometimes think market makers maybe they’re just providing liquidity by capturing that bid ask spread. Is that really all market makers are doing? You know what risks come to you by for providing liquidity? So I can’t I can’t speak to everyone in the industry but I would say based on my observation and discussions most of the larger trading firms like ours are multi-dimensional. So we’ve got uh groups that do provide uh market making providing liquidity in in the various contracts primarily in futures. They are also developing directional biases. They may have strategies that are are directional in nature. So it is it is complex. I think if you were looking at it and I’ve I’ve heard stats about people quoting and I can’t confirm whether they’re true or not. Maybe Craig could, but somebody once said like 80% of the revenue or P&L that’s generated in markets is from liquidity taking or directional trading, not necessarily from the market making. I I would guess that could probably be right. Yeah. I mean, we don’t necessarily comment on the customer mix like that, but certainly the ecosystem doesn’t work without the market maker, without the end user, and that end user is so varied. Like I said, it could be a a multinational hedge fund. It could be a bank. It could be an individual like OB, you know, and and really it all comes together to make that market market work, that market efficient and and liquid. Okay. Okay. Yeah. I want to debunk some myths here too if we can because a lot of traders think that people are after their orders. By show of hands, how many of you have been bottom or top ticked on a trade?
Some of you have never traded before. Well, some traders, they think, you know, that the market’s out for them. So, Craig, coming to you, is is this a myth? I mean, can you debunk that? Yeah, I think for this question, I’d probably actually draw on my my sort of past experience when I worked for a firm similar to Rob’s. And obviously I’m not going to give out any trade secrets here, but I I would say sort of at least in my experience and again like like Rob said, we can’t speak for every firm out there. It’s a resounding no, right? And and and our job was simply and that literally is the job of a market maker is to provide bids and offers so that the end user can transact on them. We want the end user to transact on our bids and offers. Um but we have absolutely no idea who’s who’s hitting our bids and offers. And again, I’m saying are this is a past life of mine. Um, but you know, it’s it’s something I hear a lot. You know what I say to people is I if you’re an individual trader, those are the markets you want to be in. You want to be in the market where there’s a hundred firms like Robs that are competing for that trade. And and believe me, it’s as a competitive a space as it gets. So they’re competing with each other for your trade. And that’s again, that’s the market you want to be in because if it’s good enough for those hedge funds that I just mentioned, if that market is good enough to deal on for them, I would suggest it’s good enough. And and with all due respect, Obi for Obi. You know, it’s funny. Back in the day, I had a a trader who used to I mean, this is a professional trader, so people are feeling like the world’s watching him. He used to say, “Do they have cameras on me?” like he you know when he’d be in a trade he’d feel like somebody must have seen something that the markets are like that in some ways. Yeah. We we feel like they’re watching us. They’re after us. So you know I want to come back to you Rob because you were actually you you were speaking on this a little bit earlier how orders are kind of anonymous these days. I spoke to a trader recently on Chat with Traders. They said back in the day that there used to be kind of like an order ID and you would kind of know who’s on the other side of it. But these days, I mean, you don’t know you if you’re taking I mean, if you’re providing liquidity, adding, removing it, you may not you don’t know cuz the orders could be broken up, right? It’s all anonymous. We have no idea who’s on the other side of any trade that comes at us. And, you know, sophisticated players are slicing and dicing up their orders. Um, it’s really hard to decipher who you’re getting your fills from and what’s happening. You ultimately are just managing your strategies and your risk and you you should be accepting them and wanting them at the prices that you’re quoting. But you’re right. I I grew up with Globex over the last 25 years and in early early days you could we had the the exchanges and I think this was common amongst all exchanges did display that counterparty and you would hear things like if this bank ABC was on the other side of my trade I knew I had a 30 second wick on that trade. Those days are long long gone. Long gone. Well, Rob, how do large professional traders, they have bigger size, you know, how does how do they manage their orders? Do they break them up? Do they hide their size? How do they approach liquidity in a different way? Well, the answer is yes. And I there’s no one way that is a correct approach. There are a lot of firms that will try to manage out of positions and and kind of uh manage their portfolios with larger blocks or executions over longer periods of time. Others just just have the philosophy of once I’m ready to get out, I’m just going to go to market and I’m going to get out of my position. And so it’s it’s really there’s no no, you know, right way wrong way. But but to the point of they do and as we do, we do not want to signal to the market our intention and we will try to get out of our positions in ways that won’t create a market impact. Excellent. Yeah, great great answer. I appreciate that. You know, Craig, back to you. We’re we’re going to we’re seeing a lot of new traders enter this market. You’ve been around for for a while. You just gave us some examples, you know, from from back in the day. So, what do you what gives a trader longevity? What separates the trader that’s still here 5, 10, 20 years from now? I do appreciate you saying I’ve been around a long time rather than calling me old. So, thank you for that. Um, but I have, you know, and I think it comes it’s it’s very simple and and a a good trader is synonymous with a good risk manager. I think we all have whether it’s with myself, whether it’s OB, whether it’s a firm like Geneva, we all have indicators, we all have strategy methodologies, whatever it is that makes someone decide to put risk on, to put a trade on. None of us know if the market’s going to go up or down. What makes the good trader is that we know that not all of those trades are going to go the direction that we thought they were. So, it comes down to knowing when it’s not being able to sort of cut those losses and live to see another another day and another trade. We used to tell, you know, prospective traders uh that would interview us, a good trader is confident enough to put on the trade when they think there’s an edge, but humble enough to take it off when they’re wrong. And those can be juxtaposed sometimes. Sometimes that’s not the easiest thing to sort of learn and it’s not the in terms of sort of self-discipline uh and mental discipline. You’ve kind of got to learn that skill. I’ve heard it put another way. I had an interview with Peter Brandt recently. Did you anybody watch that one on chat with traders? Got one fan. Yeah. Strong opinions weekly held. Hey, rings true. So Obie, you’ve seen some newer traders mistakes in real time. you know, tell us about what are some common ways that traders get into big trouble. Yeah, I mean, I’ve I’ve like I said, I’ve been in the industry almost 20 years and I’ve always been on the retail side. So, uh, having the ability to take phone calls from customers and we do that, obviously, you know, we bring up your account, see what you’re doing, answer your questions. I’m going to share a personal story here because I want you guys to, you know, I’m I’m not anyone special. I’m just like you guys. So, my first trade on the S&P Mini. All right. So, I I started on the overnight trade desk in January of 2010. I spent 6 to 8 months learning. I got my series 3. I started paper trading. I discovered um our lesson from a legend in Miami, Mark Fiser. I learned his trading methodology. I set up my charts. I had all my levels, my opening range, my pivot points, and I decided, okay, today’s the day. I’ve got some some capital. I I funded my account. I think it was like $8,000, and at the time, Craig, the the margin was like 4,000. Now, it’s like 6 a little bit more. So, this was the day, right? I get home from my overnight shift. Markets open 8:30 Chicago time. It’s an opening range strategy. If it breaks below the pivot point, you get short. It breaks above the pivot point, you get long. Your stop gets placed on the other side of the opening range. Mistake number one, you lose the force for the trees. Too many times I see retail traders staring at their charts with blinders. And I did this on this day because we broke below the pivot point. I got short one E- mini. I put my stop above the opening range just like I was supposed to. Then all of a sudden, oh, I’m I’m I’m up. It’s going down. It’s going down. Like, oh, I’m up a couple hundred bucks. I’m feeling great. And then all of a sudden, just the biggest green candle just went right to the top of the opening range. I was stopped out in 5 minutes. I lost $1,600, which about 20% of my capital in one trade. So, mistake number two, trading too big. And the the moral of the story was I was so focused on my charts and my indicators, I failed to realize on TV at that moment, former Fed Chair Ben Bernani was testifying in front of Congress announcing QE2. And that was the last time I think I was short 1168. I remember that level. That was the last time the S&P ever traded at 1168. So, I bottom ticked the S&P in 2011 because I wasn’t paying attention. You bottom ticked. I didn’t see your hand up earlier, Obie. Well, hey, love at first sight, right? Look at where you are today after that. So, Rob, let’s come over to you. So, from the professional side, what separates the trader who’s you to survive and adapt from the ones who don’t? Well, I don’t I mean, I think I’ll I’ll go to Ob’s uh golf analogy. Yeah, I mean, you know, the basics of the game are all the same. It doesn’t matter if you’re managing an enormous capital base and trading in bigger size or more complex portfolio with more sophisticated technologies or approaches to trading. The reality is a great trader and Craig mentioned this earlier is a great risk manager. You have to be disciplined, focused every day when you get in uh to the office. You got to be prepared for what’s coming for that day. You got to do your homework. You got to have a game plan and you’ve got to execute it. And it does not it does not change. If you’re going to be a trader, risk management is really the number one theme. Some of you maybe have heard of the great Jack Schwagger. He was on Chat with Traders. Had a conversation with him. Guess what the I mean the common thing theme theme amongst all the wizards over hundred years risk management. Well, enough of talking about trading. Who’s ready to see a trade live? All right. So, Obie, let’s let’s bring it up. Let’s bring up a trade and then let’s do a thesis, a bullish thesis on the S&P 500. Craig, if we have this thesis, you know, how how can we put it together? Yeah. So, I’m wearing a shirt that says CME Group on it. So, when we think about S&P exposure, I’m might be a little biased, but I’m going to go naturally to the S&P futures market. Um, but beyond my own personal bias though, more practically, the S&P futures markets are the most liquid S&P markets in the world. Like if you were to compare the amount of trade, the amount of notional trade that goes through the E- mini or micro E- mini S&Ps in a given day versus something like the spider, the futures dwarf what’s going through on the security side on that ETF. So I would start with saying I want to be in the most liquid market that I can be and for the reasons I mentioned before. I want to be where those institutions are, deep, liquid, transparent market. So, I’m going to start with the S&P futures. Then beyond that, then it becomes more of a sizing issue. Do I want the size of an E- mini S&P, which I think is somewhere around $380,000 these days, or do I want to start somewhere smaller with like a micro, which is onetenth that size, 38,000, and then we even have a smaller size more recently called an Eano. So, then I think it starts to come down to sizes. And and maybe we’re going to let Obie talk a little bit about that sizing aspect. Yeah. So, what I’ve got up here, and you know, this is not too far off from kind of what I’m staring at every day on my Robin Hood Legend. I don’t have my personal indicator set. The only thing I have on here for just simplicity of the demo is the uh daily pivot point. So, just looking at yesterday’s high, low, close divided by three, and it kind of sets a No excuses, Obie. Put a green trade on. Who wants to see a green trade? Um but you know the the idea here is you know long above the pivot short below the pivot identify an area. But uh you know just looking at the tape today we’re up um you know I mentioned I’m an opening range trader. So kind of looking at that 830 uh to actually this is going to yeah right here. Here’s the 8:30 candle. Let’s just draw that so we can we can see where the opening range has been today. Uh where are you at? There we go. Uh here we go. And while you’re doing that, Craig, I have a follow-up question for you. I mean, cuz these products were once just for institutional traders, you know. So, how did we get to a market now where everyday traders have access to this? Yeah. And I think that’s again what I mentioned at the onset. That’s one of the things that’s invited so many more individual traders into these markets. And the evolution is kind of interesting. If if you go all the way back to 1997, the only S&P product that the CME offered was the what we called the standard S&P. It’s no longer around. But that was a product that was worth 500 times what the the the level of the S&P was, which when you consider the S&P at that time was only 900 points. It was a manageable product size for for institutions. But even at that time, 500 had become a big a big product, a big futures contract. So in 97, we introduced the E- Mini. Fast forward to 2019, that E- mini was a mini in name only, right? Because of the appreciation of the S&P index itself. What was an e what was a minisized contract in 97 was now an institutional for for the most part size product be just simply because the S&P had increased by so much. So in 2019, we we introduced the micros. We heard demand from the customers, the mini’s too big, we need something smaller. So, we introduced the microiz contract in the four major indices, the S&P, NASDAQ, Dow, and Russell. I’ll put you on the spot, actually, Kevin, and and this kind of speaks to why we’ve now released an even smaller product called the Eano. So, I just mentioned we were we launched the the Micros in 2019. Kevin, what do you think the NASDAQ 100 was trading just six or seven years ago when we launched it? Oh, goodness. $1, Bob. What’s that? $1, Bob. Oh, I I did this on purpose. So, just in 2019 alone, the NASDAQ was trading at 7,700. Today, the NASDAQ’s trading at over $30,000, I think. So, what was a microized contract, what was worth about $15,000 just in 2019 is now a $60,000 contract. Now, that’s still approachable for a lot of individual traders, but it has been the genesis for us to launch the even smaller product that we have now called the E Nano. Perfect. Hey, we actually have a question from an audience member. I want to go ahead and direct our attention over here. So, if we can get that mic hot.
Yeah, go ahead. Thank you. Um, I have a question. You mentioned leverage is one of the benefits of futures, right? Um for individual stocks, why don’t we have futures for individual stocks? That’s a great question and we in fact do have futures on individual stocks and in fact it’s one of the newer products that we’ve launched this year about 6 weeks ago. So about six years ago, we announced single stock futures on 55 different names. 22 of those names have microsiz contracts. So we do and you know we’re working with Robin Hood. Um they’re not available on Robin Hood’s platform yet. Uh but we are working with them. Yeah. Hey, that was a great question. Hey, so Obie, where are we at? Yeah. So, uh if we’re going to approach this and put this on, the first thing Craig mentioned is all right, what product are we trading? This is a demo account, but we are trading with house money. So, 29,000 in this account. If we were going to go to the ES, which is the S&P mini under the contract specs, we can see the margin requirement 28,700. If we put this trade on using the ES, we would be basically using our entire capital. And, you know, doing the math, that’s about, we’ll call it $1,000 of wiggle room. And on one E- mini, that’s 20 points. That that can happen in the blink of an eye where we would go from being in a position to being in a margin call and have to bring up funds into our account or close our position. So this contract would be too big for our account size. What we’ll do, as Craig mentioned, is let’s go down to the micro, which is forward/mees. That’s going to put you on the active contract. So typically futures traders retail 99% of the time we’re trading the front month active contract. It’s not like options where we’re picking an expiration. This is where all the liquidity is. Uh and this is essentially where we have the best sort of uh entrance point as a retail trader is that front month active contract. Now notice the margin requirement on this one is 2871. So onetenth the size of the ES. And with our $30,000 account, as I mentioned earlier, I like to do kind of like whatever half of my account size is, that would be my max risk. And this is where futures, you don’t have to understand the crazy math of options and understand theoretical pricing models in Greeks. The uh you have to be really good at what we call cashier math. You know, quick quick simple math. In this case, the margin requirement is 2871. We have a $29,000 account. If we had a position size of of five uh micros here, it’d be roughly $15,000 in capital we’re deploying. Uh and so that would probably be my max position size. So if we have an A+ trade setup, maybe that’s when I’m going in on the larger size, a sort of maybe B+ B minus setup, we go to two to three. And if I’m just maybe doing one like a feeler trade, just want to be involved for the day and we do one. But for this, my inner contrarian is telling me maybe we fade this rally uh from this morning, right? The we uh market since um 6 a.m. kind of hit a bottom at 7720 has rallied up to 77.82 is now trading 65. Uh if we go back to the ES chart, you can see that’s kind of sitting near the top of the opening range. If if I’m an opening range trader, I realistically wouldn’t be putting a position on here, Kevin, because to me, the opening range is no man’s land. I want to be long above it, short below it. Uh but for the purposes of this demo, I don’t know. Anyone want to get short? Got some hands. Who wants to get long here?
All right, so let’s do this. We’re going to get short here. And uh let’s define our trade. uh if we get short at 7765, let’s explain how to you’re going to the ladder. Explain the the ladder there and how traders can utilize that. Yeah, if you’re a futures trader and you’re not using the the trading ladder, you’re kind of doing it wrong. Uh unless you’re a longer position, if you’re an active trader, actively getting in and out of the market throughout the day, there’s no effic more efficient way to trade than through the ladder. You can set your orders like if we want to put a buy limit below. There we go. We’ve got an order working with one click. If we want to change that order, we slide it up and down the ladder. We’ve cancel and replaced. We want to cancel an order, we’re out. Very quick and efficient way to get in and out of a position for this. Let’s get short. And I’m just going to sell two at the market. So, we’re going to risk Oh, we’re in the big boys here. Where’s my risk manager? Sorry. Uh here we go. Mees. So, we’re going to put roughly a little bit less than $6,000 on margin requirement. And I’ll change my quantity cell two. And we’re filled. Uh, and you can see this line here. We’re filled at 66 half. And every tick this goes down. If you click the P&L button here, it’s going to tell you how much we’re making or losing. But this is where knowing this stuff cold is one of those mistakes retail retail traders make is they’re still learning this contract spec area before they move to the ladder. And so I know a contract size of two on this. Uh every point we’re making or losing uh what is it? 10 bucks. Five bucks. Thank you. See, I’m just I’m Well, how important, Obie, is it to predefine all of this before entering the trade? Like where where do you see a lot of traders messing up? Yeah. So, first things first, like we put in an order here, but we haven’t put in a stop or a target. Uh if let’s just say we’re going to put our stop back at the the top of the opening range today and that would be 70 uh 79 and a half. So first things first, we’re going to put a buy order in at 7780.
And you can see where the volume is sitting on these price levels. And there’s some liquidity up there which would make sense. And we’re going to put a buy stop at 80 and a quarter. And if we go to our P&L, we’re now risking 137 and a half. All right. So, if we we get stopped out here, that’s that’s what we’re going to take. So, know where the stop is prior to even the entry cuz a lot of traders will focus on that green lever first before ever and then perhaps even adjust them risk parameters mid trade, which is what a lot of amateurs do. You got to focus on the risk that we discussed less the money. So now that we’re in the trade, Obie, you know, you got the stop in the you got the target in as well. I mean, so where do you go from here? Where do a lot of traders mess up when they’re in let’s say whether green or red on the trade? You know, where do traders go wrong at that point? And Obie, I’m going to I’m going to jump in just one second to clarify that $5 uh question that you just had. We’re short two. Short two. So $10. So um for those because there were some people that weren’t familiar with futures and this is just one of the basic tenants of futures that I just tell people you simply have to learn. It’s not you don’t have to split the atom but futures trade in what’s called a multiplier. So they don’t trade in a number of shares like if you’re used to trading stocks and you trade a 100 shares of stock and that stock goes up by a dollar. Well that’s a $100 impact to your P&L. Futures have what’s called a multiplier. And that’s what changes among these things like e- minis, micros, and nanos is that multiplier. So if he has two of these micros on, the multiplier on a micro is five. Which means every time that the S&P moves by one full point, that’s a $10. That’s two times five. $10 impact to your P&L. And again, it’s not rocket science, but it’s just one of those things that you have to get used to if you’re making a transition from stocks to futures. Yeah. And this is where the cashier math comes in. Notice the price levels on this future go in quarters. So there it’s not like trading stocks where everything moves in pennies. So every tick in the market is a quarter point. There’s four quarters to a dollar and we have once again two contracts on the multiplier five. So now our multiplier is 10. That’s $10 of risk or profit. Every full point and every tick uh we’re sitting at is $2.50 of profit or loss. And Kevin, you had mentioned like what is sort of what happens now that we have a position on that maybe a trader gets in their own way. Well, it’s real easy to start seeing negative numbers and your brain starts playing tricks on you. So, this is one of the reasons we have a trading psychologist coming at the end of the day. Now, $25 isn’t going to get our heart racing, but imagine if we had 10 ES on or in Rob’s case, maybe one of his traders has a a 100 lot or 500 lot. you’re making or losing a lot of money really quick and your brain is trying to protect you from loss. And so a first mistake might be someone takes this stop and drags it down and tries to say, you know what, I don’t want I don’t want any more of the pain. Uh the other option if this turned into a profitable trade is instead of letting the trade work, they move that stop into a break even too fast or even at a profit, they get stopped out, take a small profit and then the market moves the way they wanted. And that is almost feels worse cuz you’re like, I was right and yet I was wrong. Yeah. Absolutely. And so, you know, if if we were looking at this, you know, I would keep an eye on this and, you know, maybe we’re looking to get out uh if if it tests the the daily pivot point. Once again, this is just sort of a generic example. I think we would have a little more nuance to this if we were uh trading for real. I I see I see is that Bob Aino at the mic? It is. Yeah. We have a question from the audience. Hey, go ahead. Go for it. So, I have two questions. So, I’ll just ask him and I’ll sit down. One is for Rob and that is do the traders that are market makers for you. Uh I remember being in the pit. We had slow days. When we had slow days we would put on longerterm speculative positions. Do your market makers have the freedom to do that in your firm? And then the second question is for both Craig and Obie as we speed toward 247 trading in absolutely everything. Do things like the opening range still exist and for how long? I know every trade that I do is entered on the close of the day. I mean, charting patterns have to mark a close, but if we’re 24/7, are there any closes anymore? Are there any opening ranges? So, whatever order. Thanks, guys. So, I I’ll I’ll take the first question. So um do our market makers have latitude to trade size on a slower day? The answer is yes. Um the the uh trading groups and every trader in the firm has a very active dialogue and relationship with our risk desk who assigns VAR and risk parameters around everything they have. Once those are assigned to the to the trading desk and the person that’s responsible for the risk, it’s up to them to do it. I would not advise people to trade bigger size because it’s a slow day or it’s boring or whatever um going on. But the answer is yes. They have full latitude uh to trade size and a lot of them have um capacity to do a lot. I I I’ll start OB and I I would just say that CME Group has has been offering we’ll call it 23×5 trading for decades, right? So I I think in terms of is there an opening range if that I think that’s already been answered, right? Because I’m not sure that the extension of the weekend really impacts that opening range that much. Now, I think there’ll be a different liquidity profile for weekend trading versus the sort of Sunday night through Friday afternoon trading, but certainly as you know, as you well know, you know, the liquidity or the the volume that happens when the the cash stock market o market opens in the morning tends to be greater than it was the couple hours preceding it and things like that. So, I’m not sure that the extension to the weekend really really changes it that much. Yeah, I would just add, you know, I I was chatting with Jason from Bruce uh about this a week ago when we were prepping for his panel to be determined, but I I I you know, whatever you do as a trader, whether it’s opening range or something different, typically you need volume and volatility for that stuff to to work. And you know, right now as an S&P futures trader, having a VIX at a 15 or 16 really makes it hard to trade intraday compared to when VIX is above 20. When I when I when VIX gets above 20, I perk up and all of a sudden I’m like, all right, the indicators and and pivot point levels and sort of the intraday expected range implied by the options market tends to come to fruition more. And as a a futures trader, like what we’re seeing now is is it’s pretty boring. It’s like watching paint dry. We want something to hit a level and then boom, drop, go up. That’s where, you know, as a futures trader, if we’re in the right side of the position, we can get in out of a position quickly where today, you know, it’s just kind of chopping around and it may be a day that I would, you know, probably not put a trade on. And and you can see we’re just sort of floating here down 35 bucks. But, um, yeah, I think it’s a good question, Bob. And you know, as a trader, you have to evolve with the markets. Yeah, these are great questions. And again, this is this whole event’s for you guys. So, continue to step up to the mic and ask questions. We actually have another one center aisle here. Go ahead with your question. Yes. My question is uh institution investors have research teams, sophisticated models, better technology and more resources than the average retail investor. So what if any sustainable edge does a retail investor actually have? I I would I would love to take that one. It’s what you just saw like we get to decide when we get in and out of the market, what our size is, what product we trade. A market maker, they’re obligated to make bids and offers. Like, they take the other side of our trade. They don’t have the discretion and directional opinion that we have. Um, now there’s trade-offs with that. There’s benefits to that. But as a retail trader, you get to define your risk. You get to pick what you do, when you do it, how you do it. I think the mistakes that a retail trader makes is they may go into a product that’s a little less liquid. They may not understand the fundamentals of something. They may trade too large. They may focus too much on their charts and not on the bigger market picture. Um, but I think that’s a a valuable edge to be able to sort of choose your own path where Rob maybe a market maker doesn’t have that freedom. I I think another dimension there is that you know I you got to think about the markets in kind of a a fractal nature right so a large institutional investor is not looking for a short price movement they’re not scalping the market right so they they’re looking to execute typically larger size take a position that fundamental research has to be justified with enough you know gain out of it to warrant the research and work that goes into that trade very good, well disciplined traders don’t can operate a lot more dynamically and nimly in the market than someone that has the burden of having to manage an enormous amount of of capital. Excellent. All right. Hey, we have 10 minutes left, so these will be the last two questions here. We’ll start with you, sir, right here. Hi there. Um, I’ve been playing around with the ladder in the app and I was wondering if there’s any feature coming for like a trailing stop order. I’ve been moving the stop and sometimes it the market price flies past me while I’m doing that. I think it cancels one and places another order. Yeah, I’m with you. I’m I’m on Grace and the rest of the futures team on that. We announced OCOs last night for equities. Uh, and I will be the biggest advocate for getting that over to the future side along with trail stops. I think, you know, there’s a trade-off with that. It’s nice to have your hands off. Um, but sometimes it’s it’s nice to have that precision of where and how you place your stop, where you move it, when you move it, where a trail stop is a little less precise. Um, but I think OCO’s for example, like this would be a perfect time to, you know, buy stop above the opening range, put a a buy limit order below. uh go to lunch and and not worry necessarily uh you know what happens with our position. We’ve defined our risk and we’re trading a liquid product. So, you know, we’re not going to probably you know, stop order is not going to rip through uh in the middle of a day unless something crazy happens. But quick followup. So, are there plans for those order types in Robin Hood? Say that again. Are there future plans for those auto types in Robin Hood? Yes, I all that stuff is on the road map. Uh if you go to the booth, find Grace, find Adam from the futures team. Uh they could probably give you more information. Great. Thank you. All right. Hey, last question here. This gentleman here. Hi. Um yeah, so futures options give us like great way to play around with futures at least for beginners or even like you know when I’m in a position how to manage it. Now ECM working with Robin Hood to launch futures options anytime. We are indeed. You know, we would we and that’s a great point cuz when you talked about how do you get exposure to the S&P, we went straight to futures. We’d be remiss not to talk about the fact that you can also get similar options exposure to the S&P through futures options that you can with options like S&P or Spider and we are in fact working with Robin Hood to try to get those on the platform as well. It’s a great question. Awesome. Thank you. Can we expect any timelines? Uh it’s on the road map. I would hopefully sometime next year. Uh but you know once again Grace and team can can provide more information but I’m almost positive probably sometime next year is is likely. Uh the one thing I’ll say though is like options versus futures is an important distinction if you know if if you’re out there trying to scalp intraday movements on the S&P. You know the efficiency and what’s the right word? um precision you get with a futures contract relative to buying a call or buying a put. When you buy an option to to scalp a short-term price move on an underlying stock or indicy, you’re bringing some additional factors into the picture. Uh especially on the shorterdated options that the you know the time premium is going to come out of that really quick if you’re wrong where with futures whether it’s S&P, oil, gold, you’re directly trading that without some of those exogenous factors that options bring in. I think futures options allow some really cool ways to define and create specific payoff diagrams combined with trading volatility and other things where this is much more of a directional approach. Thank you. All right, great. Hey, got a couple questions left as we’re wrapping up and as we’re wrapping up that trade. Uh Rob, I want to jump to you with uh as a professional liquidity provider, you know, are you when you’re on the other side of this trade, are you making a directional bet that OB’s wrong on this or are you perhaps just maybe even hedging a position? Well, it’s a it’s a great question and I think you know there are misconceptions around like what are you seeing on the screen? Is that the market maker right there? And and the reality is is that the order book is comprised of so many competing parties with a lot of different ways that they’re trying to make money. If I look at an offer in the S&P 500, I don’t know whether that person is going to be trying to hedge in a basket of stocks trading against the ETF, maybe they’re an options firm who’s gotten some risk on in the options side. The all of the markets are so integrated. That contract there represents 500 companies. And so there’s an enormous amount of data and complexity that goes into that. We are are making markets actively day in and day out. We are not I mean we don’t win on every trade. I mean there’s there’s a lot of people that I think it’s public like a lot of firms that have consistent P&L with only 51 or 52% success rate. So, a lot of people are making money as the market maker loses on trades and they still are able to profit due to the volume that they do. So, it really depends on the market. In some markets, it’s different than others. So, there’s a lot of depth there, it sounds like. Well, hey, Obie, where are we at with the trade right now? Yeah, we’re kind of treading water. We’re slightly down. We’ll call it break even. And and you know, for sake of time, we got five minutes left. This is this is another concept that I learned that I think is valuable that retail doesn’t think about. We have a physical price stop in but there’s also a concept of a a time stop. Uh something I learned from from Mark Fischer as well. So we’ve been in this position what maybe 10 15 minutes. You know if if a position doesn’t go your way in a certain amount of time sometimes that’s a sign like you know what just get out of the position move on to the next one. Uh and and now as we turn profitable, it’s like, okay, if if we think we’re just going to sit around here, maybe our initial thesis was wrong, which was very short and quick, but um you know, in this case, we may want to just cover the position and and go to lunch without risk on the table. We’re going to jump to the closing question. So, if you want to leave it up and running or uh or take it off and come take a seat. Yeah, let’s buy them back. We’re filled. You know, we made a half a point. So, and then, of course, cancel your stop and we’re out. All right. Excellent. Obie, the closing question to you is going to be, what’s one mistake you’d want every retail futures trader to avoid? I think it’s the size. I I think that’s the the biggest thing I see retail is they and let’s imagine you had that $29,000 account. they would put as much risk on as they can afford and give themselves no margin to be wrong. And I’ve seen that over and over and our customer service teams deal with that a lot. And when you’re in that position, you’re stressed. Uh you can get angry, but at the end of the day, as I pointed out earlier, you can avoid that. You can avoid that by sizing properly. Understand the math. So, if you’re wrong on a position, is it going to draw down, you know, 25 basis points to your account, a half a percent, 1%? Uh, too many times I see retail where they put on a trade and if they’re wrong, their capital’s cut in half. And at the end of the day, you’re trading capital is your lifeblood. Like, if you don’t have it, you can’t trade. And trying to hit the home run when you know a single will do. Singles add up indeed. Well, hey Craig, closing question to you. What’s one thing that every new futures trader should understand about the marketplace they’re participating in? Yeah, and I think Obie covered sort of the practical answer to that question, which is size and and make sure you’re not overtrading. So, I’ll get a little bit more, I guess, philosophical with my answer. And and I think regardless of of what market it is, I think new traders need to understand that the market’s probably not wrong when you consider all of the different market participants, all of the different liquidity providers, institutions, retail traders that make up that bid offer. And I was I know Tom Sausnoff is here today and he’s doing a keynote at three. I was lucky enough to be on the road with Tom for 10 years. And one of my favorite things that he used to say is when I look at the screen and I see a bid offer, that’s probably the right price because of all of the things I just described. So when you get long the S&P and the market goes down, it’s probably not because you’re right and everyone else is wrong. And I think that’s one early lesson that traders need to learn. And and then that goes back to that humility, being able to admit that I’m wrong, cut the losses, and and live to see another trade. 100%. And Rob, to you, what’s one misconception about the person on the other side of the trade you’d like to eliminate? Well, I I I think one misconception that’s it’s really unhealthy is thinking market makers are seeing singling out a particular uh market participant like retail. Um, you know, we’ve been in this business for a long time. There wasn’t any retail that, you know, we really saw in our markets in the early days. I mean, it was more of an institutional market. Um, but, uh, I think it’s more of to Craig’s point of like it’s a highly competitive market. And, um, you know, I I think I want to echo something that was said earlier for people that are looking to get in the game. It takes even for professional trading firms a long time to develop successful traders. You need to focus on a developing a pattern of success and a track record in your trading that gives you the confidence and the data to allow you to know how to scale. I wouldn’t even jump into like really trying to press what you’re trying to do until to the the the analogy of the golf swing. Get a predictable golf swing. get your swing right and then you know then you get out on the course. Yeah. I to echo what he said to use the golf analogy full circle. Really bad golfers go out and they play swing. The whole day they’re trying to figure out their swing. A really good golfer goes out and plays golf and they can put the ball where they want it. They can avoid the water. They can have fun. Trading is the same thing. Especially futures. You have to know those contract specs. You have to know the basics of my buy limit goes down here, my buy stop goes above, my sell limit sell stop. I see simple mistakes like that. And then at the end of the day, try to make 10 points a day, whether it’s on one nano future, which I think is a great tool. was like a practice tool so small that you can trade real money with very little risk as opposed to going to a simulator and then graduate to a micro, graduate to two, three, four, make 10 points a day before you start saying, “Well, I’m the best trader in the world and I’m going to go to the big boys and trade five or 10 ES and then all of a sudden the market will will come for you.” It does indeed. Well, hey, we’re out of time. I wish we could sit and chat for another hour, but uh hey, we started guys with one simple trade, a bullish view on the S&P 500. For Obie, it was about the thesis, the position size, execution, and risk. For Rob, it was about liquidity, inventory, hedging, time frame, and managing exposure. Uh for Craig and CME, it was about the marketplace where all those different participants and objectives come together. So, it was the same trade, three different perspectives. Houston, this is Chat with Traders. Thank you so much. Please give them a round of applause.
And once again, I get to stay up here and do my answers. Rob, pleasure. Craig, Kevin, thank you. Thank you. Thank you guys. This was a fun one. Appreciate you letting me sit in on this one. With that, we made it to lunch. Don’t forget before you head out, we’ve got a stacked afternoon starting at one sharp. We’re back here with the midterm elections panel. Then Robin Hood Ventures takes aside private markets and disruptive innovation. Kathy Wood is on that. Then we have Jared Tendler and the mental game of trading. And of course, we’ll close out our programming with Tom Sausnoff and JJ Kahan for lessons from a legend. And then me, Vlad, and Q will officially put a close to the summit. For everyone watching online, don’t forget the stream stays live through lunch. Set yourself an alarm for 1 pm central time and we’ll come back with the big afternoon ahead. Everyone here in Houston, grab some lunch, check out the booths, enjoy the break. We’ll see you back here at 1 p.m. sharp.